Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
22.2 grievance victory!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="100%ORIONComplianceGuy" data-source="post: 5997894" data-attributes="member: 109837"><p>Not necessarily. Our BA is known to side with certain drivers to maintain the status quo even though there is clear contract language being violated. We’ve been told “I will enforce the language if more drivers want it that way“ on multiple issues.</p><p></p><p>And when the language is “silent” on an issue he defaults to seniority. Which, at first, sounds good. But seniority shouldn’t give someone the right to take bid work away from other drivers. Or allow them to sign up for extra work on preload and then take a layoff from driving the same day. Thats literally taking money out of someone else’s pocket. Also, they can get out of driving but still get a report by scanning or SPAinf on preload. There are a few other agendas at play there as well.</p><p></p><p>When an BA or steward allows things like this to happen under the guise of “seniority“ it gives some drivers a sense of invincibility and they think they can literally do whatever they want despite what the contract says. And yes, sometimes certain issues aren’t actually in the contract, but that’s where logical thinking people with a desire to do the right thing would stop this nonsense from happening.</p><p></p><p>Local.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="100%ORIONComplianceGuy, post: 5997894, member: 109837"] Not necessarily. Our BA is known to side with certain drivers to maintain the status quo even though there is clear contract language being violated. We’ve been told “I will enforce the language if more drivers want it that way“ on multiple issues. And when the language is “silent” on an issue he defaults to seniority. Which, at first, sounds good. But seniority shouldn’t give someone the right to take bid work away from other drivers. Or allow them to sign up for extra work on preload and then take a layoff from driving the same day. Thats literally taking money out of someone else’s pocket. Also, they can get out of driving but still get a report by scanning or SPAinf on preload. There are a few other agendas at play there as well. When an BA or steward allows things like this to happen under the guise of “seniority“ it gives some drivers a sense of invincibility and they think they can literally do whatever they want despite what the contract says. And yes, sometimes certain issues aren’t actually in the contract, but that’s where logical thinking people with a desire to do the right thing would stop this nonsense from happening. Local. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
22.2 grievance victory!
Top