Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="M I Indy" data-source="post: 1451289" data-attributes="member: 52889"><p>Why must you try to put words in my mouth. Never said I was savvy, I like to read, maybe you should try it while you sit this peak out, as you said you would. Tell me why I should let you know anything. I don&#039;t know nor have ever met you, why would I plaster it on this forum where many spies and wannabes lurk, you may even be one. I like to think not, but, how do I know. I do respect X legal, they are very intelligent, they are just doing what they are retained for. They fight/fought hard on IC model, even though they knew it was a too vague document. Tell me, since you are much the fact finder (LOL), where I implied&nbsp; due diligence has not been done. Now maybe you can share the intricate differences between ISP and IC. Here&#039;s a hint: I did say X is not your friend or your biz partner, they&#039;re your customer. Sweet Lou is your business partner, in this current format, as I &quot;interpret&quot; the ISP. Do you feel comfortable with Sweet Lou ( 7th grader who can only read a book on audio) and his &quot;gentlemen agreement&quot; to cap pay in his terminal? X said that &quot;is not their business&quot; to partake in such arrangements. X has put you in front of the bus and given the Sweet Lou&#039;s the keys and full tank of gas. Sometimes the bad guys win, X has made difficult for you to fight them, and if you do, I&#039;m sure they will make calls as to have your &quot;operation&quot; checked for practices, such as hourly rate, OT, etc. Two words I posted &quot;deflect and contradict&quot; will become an issue, are you savvy enough to take that on when the Sweet Lou&#039;s (your real biz partner since you share the same one and only customer) violate structure, spirit, and intent of corporate laws. Your &quot;operation&quot; then comes into the spotlight due to the actions of one, two.....or more of your biz partners, or their drivers. Have you done your due diligence? Probably not since you didn&#039;t know just what to due diligence on. Remember, I said I help those who helped me, escape this environment, never said I was out to end ISP. That is your situation, mine is now as you said &quot;a dead horse&quot;. Just trying to give you a different perspective than the deflect, contradict perspective your customer gives you. Sorry this was so lengthy, but, I won&#039;t be posting for a while, to much to enjoy during the holiday season. You will probably argue that I&#039;m just a hater, so let&#039;s just leave it at &quot;we just disagree&quot; and not get nasty. No ill toward anyone here, more my sympathies. Get to reading will ya&#039;, its great mental exercise!</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="M I Indy, post: 1451289, member: 52889"] Why must you try to put words in my mouth. Never said I was savvy, I like to read, maybe you should try it while you sit this peak out, as you said you would. Tell me why I should let you know anything. I don't know nor have ever met you, why would I plaster it on this forum where many spies and wannabes lurk, you may even be one. I like to think not, but, how do I know. I do respect X legal, they are very intelligent, they are just doing what they are retained for. They fight/fought hard on IC model, even though they knew it was a too vague document. Tell me, since you are much the fact finder (LOL), where I implied due diligence has not been done. Now maybe you can share the intricate differences between ISP and IC. Here's a hint: I did say X is not your friend or your biz partner, they're your customer. Sweet Lou is your business partner, in this current format, as I "interpret" the ISP. Do you feel comfortable with Sweet Lou ( 7th grader who can only read a book on audio) and his "gentlemen agreement" to cap pay in his terminal? X said that "is not their business" to partake in such arrangements. X has put you in front of the bus and given the Sweet Lou's the keys and full tank of gas. Sometimes the bad guys win, X has made difficult for you to fight them, and if you do, I'm sure they will make calls as to have your "operation" checked for practices, such as hourly rate, OT, etc. Two words I posted "deflect and contradict" will become an issue, are you savvy enough to take that on when the Sweet Lou's (your real biz partner since you share the same one and only customer) violate structure, spirit, and intent of corporate laws. Your "operation" then comes into the spotlight due to the actions of one, two.....or more of your biz partners, or their drivers. Have you done your due diligence? Probably not since you didn't know just what to due diligence on. Remember, I said I help those who helped me, escape this environment, never said I was out to end ISP. That is your situation, mine is now as you said "a dead horse". Just trying to give you a different perspective than the deflect, contradict perspective your customer gives you. Sorry this was so lengthy, but, I won't be posting for a while, to much to enjoy during the holiday season. You will probably argue that I'm just a hater, so let's just leave it at "we just disagree" and not get nasty. No ill toward anyone here, more my sympathies. Get to reading will ya', its great mental exercise! [/QUOTE]

Verification