Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 5227591" data-attributes="member: 44954">First you claimed the deal fell through because he didn&#039;t want a union.&nbsp; It didn&#039;t.Then you claimed he didn&#039;t like the terms of the deal. He did, he accepted them, and announced they would locate there.Then you claimed radical Democrats didn&#039;t destroy the deal, Amazon &quot;ran itself off&quot;.&nbsp; You repeatedly dodged explaining how.Then you claimed he was &quot;blackmailing&quot; them.&nbsp; He wasn&#039;t, they were begging him to come there.Then you said the deal fell through because radical Democrats didn&#039;t like the subsidies.&nbsp; Really came full circle there, that&#039;s my original point that you tried to disagree with LMAO.And now of course, you&#039;ve finally gotten to the true cause of your ramblings.&nbsp; Classic Marxist class warfare:&nbsp; Bezos rich, rich man bad.SMH</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 5227591, member: 44954"] First you claimed the deal fell through because he didn't want a union. It didn't. Then you claimed he didn't like the terms of the deal. He did, he accepted them, and announced they would locate there. Then you claimed radical Democrats didn't destroy the deal, Amazon "ran itself off". You repeatedly dodged explaining how. Then you claimed he was "blackmailing" them. He wasn't, they were begging him to come there. Then you said the deal fell through because radical Democrats didn't like the subsidies. Really came full circle there, that's my original point that you tried to disagree with LMAO. And now of course, you've finally gotten to the true cause of your ramblings. Classic Marxist class warfare: Bezos rich, rich man bad. SMH [/QUOTE]

Verification