Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
And So It Begins...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 4125292" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>Same old same old out of you. The Democrat sponsored and passed programs that directly benefit you are the greatest ever. The ones that don't are evil drains on the public coffer.</p><p>BTW Today the CBO stated that due to the fact that corporate tax receipts even factoring in the reduced tax rate are still coming in lower than projected and if Congress doesn't raise the debt ceiling the federal government will run out of money in September. And so here you are the consummate corporate apologist crying about federal debt. And so you think that there HAS to be a segment of the population working for low wages while at the same time crying the blues over the fact that X cheated you out of pay and pension. Sure, why not? Why shouldn't the person working for peanuts NOT be you? </p><p></p><p>Furthermore why are there states trying to raise the minimum wage at the state level? Simple. Scores of people out there working and busting their cans for nothing have to enroll in publicly funded welfare programs in order to survive. Yet the consercuks are crying about it's impact on so called "small business" The question therefore becomes if so called small business needs public wage subsidies in order to keep going why should they be allowed to stay in business in the first place? A clear and indisputable example of corporate welfare. As a corporate apologist why is your response ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 4125292, member: 58386"] Same old same old out of you. The Democrat sponsored and passed programs that directly benefit you are the greatest ever. The ones that don't are evil drains on the public coffer. BTW Today the CBO stated that due to the fact that corporate tax receipts even factoring in the reduced tax rate are still coming in lower than projected and if Congress doesn't raise the debt ceiling the federal government will run out of money in September. And so here you are the consummate corporate apologist crying about federal debt. And so you think that there HAS to be a segment of the population working for low wages while at the same time crying the blues over the fact that X cheated you out of pay and pension. Sure, why not? Why shouldn't the person working for peanuts NOT be you? Furthermore why are there states trying to raise the minimum wage at the state level? Simple. Scores of people out there working and busting their cans for nothing have to enroll in publicly funded welfare programs in order to survive. Yet the consercuks are crying about it's impact on so called "small business" The question therefore becomes if so called small business needs public wage subsidies in order to keep going why should they be allowed to stay in business in the first place? A clear and indisputable example of corporate welfare. As a corporate apologist why is your response ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
And So It Begins...
Top