Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lue C Fur" data-source="post: 730814" data-attributes="member: 25159"><p>You would think that in the midst of the <a href="http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/realitycheck/2010/20100506042624.aspx" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff4010">liberal media's fight</span></a> to rip Arizona's Immigration Law, that the phrase ‘illegal immigrant' would be fairly easy to use in an appropriate manner. Yet that is seemingly only the case when the phrase is used to cast common-sense immigration enforcement as discriminatory. <span style="color: blue">But when it comes to a story that could shed light on why enforcement is a necessity for the safety and security of a nation and its people, then the phrase - no matter how accurate - is quickly forgotten.</span> One high profile case, the murder of Chandra Levy, highlights this fact. It has been quite some time (over a year) since Ingmar Guandique was <a href="http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/chandralevy/guandique30309cmp.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff4010">charged with Levy's murder</span></a>, and much longer since he was identified as being an <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/23/return-of-the-chandra-levy-case-and-illegal-alien-sex-offender-ingmar-guandique/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff4010">illegal immigrant</span></a> from El Salvador. </p><p>And while Guandique's illegal status isn't necessarily news to those having actually followed the case, you would think it was still an unproven fact based on media reports past and present. </p><p>As a recent update reveals, attorney's working on behalf of Guandique argued that he would not get a fair trial in Washington, though a judge has now determined that the trial will indeed stay in DC. Coinciding with this news, is the recent release of a book covering the case entitled, <em>Finding Chandra</em>. With these updates, one has to wonder how far the media has come in their willingness to report the truth. How far have they come since Michelle Malkin noted a perfect record of going 115 for 115 in reports failing to mention the suspect's illegal status back in 2002? As it turns out, not far at all...</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/realitycheck/2010/20100506042624.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/realitycheck/2010/20100506042624.aspx</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lue C Fur, post: 730814, member: 25159"] You would think that in the midst of the [URL="http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/realitycheck/2010/20100506042624.aspx"][COLOR=#ff4010]liberal media's fight[/COLOR][/URL] to rip Arizona's Immigration Law, that the phrase ‘illegal immigrant' would be fairly easy to use in an appropriate manner. Yet that is seemingly only the case when the phrase is used to cast common-sense immigration enforcement as discriminatory. [COLOR=blue]But when it comes to a story that could shed light on why enforcement is a necessity for the safety and security of a nation and its people, then the phrase - no matter how accurate - is quickly forgotten.[/COLOR] One high profile case, the murder of Chandra Levy, highlights this fact. It has been quite some time (over a year) since Ingmar Guandique was [URL="http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/chandralevy/guandique30309cmp.html"][COLOR=#ff4010]charged with Levy's murder[/COLOR][/URL], and much longer since he was identified as being an [URL="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/23/return-of-the-chandra-levy-case-and-illegal-alien-sex-offender-ingmar-guandique/"][COLOR=#ff4010]illegal immigrant[/COLOR][/URL] from El Salvador. And while Guandique's illegal status isn't necessarily news to those having actually followed the case, you would think it was still an unproven fact based on media reports past and present. As a recent update reveals, attorney's working on behalf of Guandique argued that he would not get a fair trial in Washington, though a judge has now determined that the trial will indeed stay in DC. Coinciding with this news, is the recent release of a book covering the case entitled, [I]Finding Chandra[/I]. With these updates, one has to wonder how far the media has come in their willingness to report the truth. How far have they come since Michelle Malkin noted a perfect record of going 115 for 115 in reports failing to mention the suspect's illegal status back in 2002? As it turns out, not far at all... [URL]http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/realitycheck/2010/20100506042624.aspx[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
Top
