Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 732037" data-attributes="member: 13254"> First of all, the Utilities Commissioner did not &quot;threaten&quot; to shut off the electricity. That claim is a blown out of proportion lib media writer&#039;s slant on what he said. He offered to adjust the contract so their boycott could be 100% AZ free. Not a threat, but an offer.Also in the article it was said that LA was an owner in the AZ power plant and I don&#039;t doubt that, what I do doubt is that their portion is large enough to out vote the setting commissioners. The offer from AZ&#039;s UC has almost as much teeth as LA&#039;s boycott, both are nothing more than gestures. It seems to me that LA has indeed threatened AZ outright though, I guess that&#039;s OK.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 732037, member: 13254"] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Sienna][I][B] First of all, the Utilities Commissioner did not "threaten" to shut off the electricity. That claim is a blown out of proportion lib media writer's slant on what he said. He offered to adjust the contract so their boycott could be 100% AZ free. Not a threat, but an offer.[/B][/I] [I][B]Also in the article it was said that LA was an owner in the AZ power plant and I don't doubt that, what I do doubt is that their portion is large enough to out vote the setting commissioners. The offer from AZ's UC has almost as much teeth as LA's boycott, both are nothing more than gestures. It seems to me that LA has indeed threatened AZ outright though, I guess that's OK.[/B][/I] [I][B][/B][/I][/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification