Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 732695" data-attributes="member: 12952"><p><strong>It is well established that ICE, CBP (Customs & Border Protection) are specifically empowered to search travelers and their belongings within 100 miles of a border/coast without probable cause or a warrant. </strong></p><p><strong>These searches are specifically exempted from the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. Pursuant to this authority, CBP/ICE may generally stop and search the property of any traveler entering or exiting the United States at random, or <span style="color: maroon"><strong>even based largely on ethnic profiles</strong></span>. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>In the Supreme Court decision, <span style="color: black"><strong>United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985)</strong></span> the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled that “<span style="color: maroon"><strong>travelers may be stopped [and searched] at . . . the border without individualized suspicion even if the stop [or search] is based largely on ethnicity</strong></span>.“) (citing <span style="color: black"><strong>United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562-563(1976)</strong></span>). </strong></p><p><strong>Critics of Arizona’s law state that state & local police have no authority to detain and ask people about their immigration status. THEY ARE WRONG! </strong></p><p><strong>In <span style="color: black"><strong>Mueller v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005)</strong></span>, SCOTUS ruled UNAMIMOUSLY that state & local law enforcement officers may indeed ask about the immigration status of detained persons. </strong></p><p><strong>In <span style="color: black"><strong>Gonzales v. City of Peoria, 722 F2d 468</strong></span>, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that local law enforcement officers are permitted to enforce <u>criminal provisions</u> of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. </strong></p><p><strong>Further rebuttal of claims that local/state police lack of authority can be found in a <span style="color: black"><strong>Department of Justice memo of April 3, 2002</strong></span> which concludes that “states have an inherent power, subject to federal preemption, to make arrests for violation of federal law”. That memo continues to be in effect as of this writing. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Obama has illegally ordered Homeland Security employees and leaders to ignore the oath they swore when they took office to enforce the laws of our country. Among them is John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, <span style="color: black"><strong>who said</strong></span> that his agency will not necessarily process illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona authorities</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 732695, member: 12952"] [B]It is well established that ICE, CBP (Customs & Border Protection) are specifically empowered to search travelers and their belongings within 100 miles of a border/coast without probable cause or a warrant. These searches are specifically exempted from the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. Pursuant to this authority, CBP/ICE may generally stop and search the property of any traveler entering or exiting the United States at random, or [COLOR=maroon][B]even based largely on ethnic profiles[/B][/COLOR]. In the Supreme Court decision, [COLOR=black][B]United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985)[/B][/COLOR] the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled that “[COLOR=maroon][B]travelers may be stopped [and searched] at . . . the border without individualized suspicion even if the stop [or search] is based largely on ethnicity[/B][/COLOR].“) (citing [COLOR=black][B]United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562-563(1976)[/B][/COLOR]). Critics of Arizona’s law state that state & local police have no authority to detain and ask people about their immigration status. THEY ARE WRONG! In [COLOR=black][B]Mueller v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005)[/B][/COLOR], SCOTUS ruled UNAMIMOUSLY that state & local law enforcement officers may indeed ask about the immigration status of detained persons. In [COLOR=black][B]Gonzales v. City of Peoria, 722 F2d 468[/B][/COLOR], the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that local law enforcement officers are permitted to enforce [U]criminal provisions[/U] of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. Further rebuttal of claims that local/state police lack of authority can be found in a [COLOR=black][B]Department of Justice memo of April 3, 2002[/B][/COLOR] which concludes that “states have an inherent power, subject to federal preemption, to make arrests for violation of federal law”. That memo continues to be in effect as of this writing. Obama has illegally ordered Homeland Security employees and leaders to ignore the oath they swore when they took office to enforce the laws of our country. Among them is John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, [COLOR=black][B]who said[/B][/COLOR] that his agency will not necessarily process illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona authorities[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
Top