Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KingofBrown" data-source="post: 735874" data-attributes="member: 28771">Go back and read again my friend. But, first read my untouchable little babies: The Bill of Rights. From 1 to 10. And if you have time, Amendment 14th, Plyler v. Doe, Wong Wing v. U.S, Yick Wo v. Hopkins. And I still have a few more, but I won&#039;t overwhelm you with so much reading. I&#039;ve cited your wrong statements saying &quot;that illegals didn&#039;t have rights, and that they deserve to be discriminated,&quot; just to name a few. I pointed you out that illegal aliens also had individual rights under any jurisdiction, now, do I have to cite you the 14th Amendment in this. And do I have to cite you the laws been violated on every single statement I give you. You don&#039;t know what is racism? Racial profiling, etc., and that it isn&#039;t permitted by law. I thought you did know our Constitution. You seem to be a Patriotic US Citizen, but the problem is that you don&#039;t know the Constitution and what it implies. May be if you did, you would think in a different way... oh no, sorry, your prejudice and your political affiliations won&#039;t let you. I&#039;ve cited SB1070, you tell me &quot;that&#039;s not what it implies.&quot; I thought you were going to tell me how it doesn&#039;t. You will not do MY research. You will do YOURS, and tell me how it&#039;s not what it implies what I said. And please, although I have zero tolerance about anyone touching my Bill of Rights, I want to know your point of view on the part of &quot;Reasonable Suspicion,&quot; &quot;The &quot;solely,&quot; color, race, nationality,&quot; etc. crap. I&#039;ve cited you part of the law, but you haven&#039;t explain me your point of view on how my statements don&#039;t imply to the law. I thought you were going to place the rest of the law (the rest that you said I ignore) and explain how in the world they write something like the &quot;solely,&quot; color, race, or national origin, and all that stuff.No problem dude, you can mention me in any post if that&#039;s what you want, then.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KingofBrown, post: 735874, member: 28771"] Go back and read again my friend. But, first read my untouchable little babies: The Bill of Rights. From 1 to 10. And if you have time, Amendment 14th, Plyler v. Doe, Wong Wing v. U.S, Yick Wo v. Hopkins. And I still have a few more, but I won't overwhelm you with so much reading. I've cited your wrong statements saying "that illegals didn't have rights, and that they deserve to be discriminated," just to name a few. I pointed you out that illegal aliens also had individual rights under any jurisdiction, now, do I have to cite you the 14th Amendment in this. And do I have to cite you the laws been violated on every single statement I give you. You don't know what is racism? Racial profiling, etc., and that it isn't permitted by law. I thought you did know our Constitution. You seem to be a Patriotic US Citizen, but the problem is that you don't know the Constitution and what it implies. May be if you did, you would think in a different way... oh no, sorry, your prejudice and your political affiliations won't let you. I've cited SB1070, you tell me "that's not what it implies." I thought you were going to tell me how it doesn't. You will not do MY research. You will do YOURS, and tell me how it's not what it implies what I said. And please, although I have zero tolerance about anyone touching my Bill of Rights, I want to know your point of view on the part of "Reasonable Suspicion," "The "solely," color, race, nationality," etc. crap. I've cited you part of the law, but you haven't explain me your point of view on how my statements don't imply to the law. I thought you were going to place the rest of the law (the rest that you said I ignore) and explain how in the world they write something like the "solely," color, race, or national origin, and all that stuff. No problem dude, you can mention me in any post if that's what you want, then. [/QUOTE]

Verification