Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 737325" data-attributes="member: 13254">Go back and read again my friend. But, first read my untouchable little babies: The Bill of Rights. From 1 to 10. And if you have time, Amendment 14th, Plyler v. Doe, Wong Wing v. U.S, Yick Wo v. Hopkins. And I still have a few more, but I won't overwhelm you with so much reading. I've cited your wrong statements saying "that illegals didn't have rights, and that they deserve to be discriminated," just to name a few.[FONT=&quot]I never said nor implied, "that illegals didn't have rights, and that they deserve to be discriminated,” [/FONT]Oh yes you did! Page 34, post #498[FONT=&quot]I said that the law did not violate the Constitutional rights of illegals. [/FONT]Where? Did you regret it?I pointed you out that illegal aliens also had individual rights under any jurisdiction, now, do I have to cite you the 14th Amendment in this.   Here is my complete post #498, minus the quote from bbsam:    Please show me where I said illegals didn’t have rights and they deserved to be discriminated against. If you can’t follow the logic in the quote above, you need more help than you can find on here. [FONT=&quot]This law does not [/FONT]Don't be mixing things up. I was refering to your comment on page 34, post #498   I contend that SB1070 is not a racist law and that it does not violate the 14th amendment. I posted a clip of the pertinent  portion of the 14th amendment that focused on equal rights of all people under the jurisdiction and it is not being denied by SB1070. How is that mixing thing up?And do I have to cite you the laws been violated on every single statement I give you. Well, just saying a law is being violated isn’t much to go on. Then you need to make a further reading so you know what we're talking about.  I do know what I am talking about; it appears you are the one struggling. In the future I will try to type very slowly, so you can understand it. My point was and still is, you keep yelling that the law and that Constitution are being violated , but you weren’t saying what part of the law was violating what part of the Constitution.  You don't know what is racism? [FONT=&quot]Of course I know what racism is, but I’m not sure you do. Do you know the difference in race and nationality? [/FONT]Oh, I forgot that's another outworn statement you got. Race and Nationality... And that's why you feel open about calling them the "wetguys", page 32, post #475. At the end you're not offending any race... YOU ARE!  This following quote is every word I posted in #475, please show me where I used the term “wetguys”, what part of my words were offensive? [/FONT]  Racial profiling, etc., and that it isn't permitted by law.[FONT=&quot]Racial profiling is expressly disallowed in SB1070, it specifically mentions so in several places. [/FONT]I thought you did know our Constitution. You seem to be a Patriotic US Citizen, but the problem is that you don't know the Constitution and what it implies. May be if you did, you would think in a different way...[FONT=&quot]Maybe if you knew it as well as you say you do, you would be thinking different.[/FONT] Nah! I believe what I believe because I've read too much about my Constitution. And I still have much to go.  Well Mr. Constitution, I’m afraid your preconceived notions on SB1070 do not coincide with the 14th Amendment or the 5th.oh no, sorry, your prejudice and your political affiliations won't let you. [FONT=&quot]You have seen no prejudiced statements from me. Uh? I have never viewed this as a race issue, but an issue of people being in our country illegally and all the problems that follow.[/FONT] Yeah right. They're from a different national origin; not another race. You think the word "Discrimination" is just a common simple word. You think a person deserves to be discriminated? You're leaving the different treatment to that person not only for race, but about anything our Constitution does not allow, even to be discrminated for religion. You don't even know the magnitude of absurdity of your sentence. Discrimination against illegals from Mexico is not racism.- trplnkl      [FONT=&quot]Oh now you want to bring religion into this fray? I think not, I have never mentioned religion, SB1070 never mentioned religion. Where do you get the perverted idea that religion has anything at all to do with the law or this debate? You have no idea what religion I am and it’s none of your business. Now can we get back to the subject?[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]    You assume that when I said” Discrimination against illegals from Mexico is not racism.- trplnkl” that I condoned discrimination, what a stretch and twist. Read that sentence again, it is NOT racism, it IS nationalism. The discrimination is based on where they came from, not what race they are. Again, I don’t think you know the difference.To be continued......  [FONT=&quot][/FONT]</blockquote>

Verification