Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KingofBrown" data-source="post: 746387" data-attributes="member: 28771">that started with (not solely) considering race… And my question from the beginning was: Who the heck with an IQ of 20 signs such an absurdity? LOL.&nbsp;The more fundamental problem with the law is its vague language. It requires law enforcement officials to demand papers from an individual when they have a &quot;reasonable suspicion&quot; that he is an illegal immigrant.When used in a law-enforcement context, &quot;reasonable suspicion&quot; is always understood to be subjective, but it must be capable of being articulated. In the case of identifying illegal immigrants, the ambiguity of what this &quot;crime&quot; looks like risks including an individual&#039;s appearance, which would seem to violate the Constitution&#039;s equal protection clause. Such ambiguity is especially dangerous when prescribed to an issue as fraught with emotion as that of illegal immigration. -Sheriff Clarence Dupnik</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KingofBrown, post: 746387, member: 28771"] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][B][I][COLOR=#333333]that [/COLOR][/I][/B][B][I][COLOR=#333333][SIZE=7]started[/SIZE] [/COLOR][/I][/B][B][I][COLOR=#333333]with (not solely) considering race… [/COLOR][/I][/B][COLOR=#333333][B][COLOR=#333333][I]And my question from the beginning was: Who the heck with an IQ of 20 signs such an absurdity? LOL.[/I][/COLOR][/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=4] [/SIZE] [SIZE=4][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]The more fundamental problem with the law is its [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]vague[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode] language. It requires law enforcement officials to demand papers from an individual when they have a "reasonable suspicion" that he is an illegal immigrant.[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=4][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]When used in a law-enforcement context, "[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]reasonable suspicion[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]" is always understood to be subjective, but it must be capable of being articulated. In the case of identifying illegal immigrants, the [/FONT][/COLOR][B][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]ambiguity [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=#222222][FONT=Lucida Sans Unicode]of what this "crime" looks like risks including an individual's appearance, which would seem to violate the Constitution's equal protection clause. Such ambiguity is especially dangerous when prescribed to an issue as fraught with emotion as that of illegal immigration. -Sheriff Clarence Dupnik[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]

Verification