Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 750930" data-attributes="member: 12952">The Question of the&nbsp; Day&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; The DOJ Lawsuit&nbsp; against Arizona’s ILLEGAL immigration law (SB1070) specifically states&nbsp; “…a state may not establish its own immigration policy” and&nbsp; alleges that the Feds have “preeminent federal authority and&nbsp; responsibility over immigration” as it’s justification. So here’s the&nbsp; questions of the day.If the DOJ is so&nbsp; concerned about reserving and protecting that “preeminent federal&nbsp; authority and responsibility” why aren’t they also suing SANCTUARY&nbsp; CITIES?Please excuse us if&nbsp; we don’t hold our breath waiting for Robert Gibbs to answer that&nbsp; question.One Old Veteran</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 750930, member: 12952"] [B]The Question of the Day[/B] [B]The DOJ Lawsuit against Arizona’s ILLEGAL immigration law (SB1070) specifically states “…[I]a state may not establish its own immigration policy[/I]” and alleges that the Feds have “[I]preeminent federal authority and responsibility over immigration[/I]” as it’s justification. So here’s the questions of the day. If the DOJ is so concerned about reserving and protecting that “preeminent federal authority and responsibility” why aren’t they also suing [COLOR=black][B]SANCTUARY CITIES[/B][/COLOR]? Please excuse us if we don’t hold our breath waiting for Robert Gibbs to answer that question.[/B] [RIGHT][B]One Old Veteran[/B][/RIGHT] [/QUOTE]

Verification