Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 751278" data-attributes="member: 8259">OK got it the reason you race bait/straw man argument is because you have nothing else. I just read the law again and I realize that there is no way that you can say those things above if you had read it. Even if English is your second language none of the things you claim are in the law.&nbsp; I see you still have not given a solid answer about the reporters question so I am guessing that all this change of subject crap means that you know you are wrong again. There is really nothing new in this law but the requirement for local law enforcement to follow federal law. Federal law is specifically cited. The Supreme Court has already ruled that if the police have an encounter with you that you must tell them your identity. The Supreme Court has already said that police can question and detain someone under a reasonable suspicion. All you have left is false charges of racism and that is not going to get you anywhere. You asked me a question and I answered it. I have no idea why you keep addressing me. I have no idea what reasonable suspect means. I never saw it in the law. Save your race baiting for someone else. I have no desire to hear what you think is bigotry. I hope I was clear.&nbsp;In this country if you do not think that the police can question you if they have a reasonable suspicion that you committed a crime than you are living a fantasy. If you do not think that you have to identify yourself to the police under those same circumstances you are beyond a fantasy. &nbsp;Please do not reply again. It is a waste of both our times as you do not want a discussion. I&#039;m not the one to hold your hand through the facts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 751278, member: 8259"] OK got it the reason you race bait/straw man argument is because you have nothing else. I just read the law again and I realize that there is no way that you can say those things above if you had read it. Even if English is your second language none of the things you claim are in the law. I see you still have not given a solid answer about the reporters question so I am guessing that all this change of subject crap means that you know you are wrong again. There is really nothing new in this law but the requirement for local law enforcement to follow federal law. Federal law is specifically cited. The Supreme Court has already ruled that if the police have an encounter with you that you must tell them your identity. The Supreme Court has already said that police can question and detain someone under a reasonable suspicion. All you have left is false charges of racism and that is not going to get you anywhere. You asked me a question and I answered it. I have no idea why you keep addressing me. I have no idea what reasonable suspect means. I never saw it in the law. Save your race baiting for someone else. I have no desire to hear what you think is bigotry. I hope I was clear. In this country if you do not think that the police can question you if they have a reasonable suspicion that you committed a crime than you are living a fantasy. If you do not think that you have to identify yourself to the police under those same circumstances you are beyond a fantasy. Please do not reply again. It is a waste of both our times as you do not want a discussion. I'm not the one to hold your hand through the facts. [/QUOTE]

Verification