Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 751695" data-attributes="member: 8259">I&#039;m not claiming it I am saying that it is fact. There is no new immigration law, no new enforcement mechanism, and no new funding for enforcement. All it does is require locals to enforce federal law and require business to use everify. Nothing new. The Feds already have the programs set up. The laws already exist.&nbsp;&nbsp; I am also saying that you have posted multiple lies and that you would do better to try and make your point using things that are true. You addressed me. I have no idea why as you had nothing constructive to say about the press conference I linked to. I have told you already that what you think does not matter to me. You&#039;ve lied about the law being bigoted, lied about it allowing police to go to another country and detain someone about to come here illegally, lied about the law raiding houses without warrants, and you keep changing what you think the law says. I have no idea why and I could really care less. Good luck with your race baiting/straw man arguments but just not with me. &nbsp;You asked me what I honestly thought and I still think that you honestly have made a horrible case against this law built on lies, falsehoods, and misrepresentations. &nbsp;If you opposed the law because you believe in freedom and think people should be allowed to travel where they wanted and work for whatever wages they agreed to I could respect that argument. Heck I might would even join in with you to make it but this silly dishonesty that you use is pitiful.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 751695, member: 8259"] I'm not claiming it I am saying that it is fact. There is no new immigration law, no new enforcement mechanism, and no new funding for enforcement. All it does is require locals to enforce federal law and require business to use everify. Nothing new. The Feds already have the programs set up. The laws already exist. I am also saying that you have posted multiple lies and that you would do better to try and make your point using things that are true. You addressed me. I have no idea why as you had nothing constructive to say about the press conference I linked to. I have told you already that what you think does not matter to me. You've lied about the law being bigoted, lied about it allowing police to go to another country and detain someone about to come here illegally, lied about the law raiding houses without warrants, and you keep changing what you think the law says. I have no idea why and I could really care less. Good luck with your race baiting/straw man arguments but just not with me. You asked me what I honestly thought and I still think that you honestly have made a horrible case against this law built on lies, falsehoods, and misrepresentations. If you opposed the law because you believe in freedom and think people should be allowed to travel where they wanted and work for whatever wages they agreed to I could respect that argument. Heck I might would even join in with you to make it but this silly dishonesty that you use is pitiful. [/QUOTE]

Verification