Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 751777" data-attributes="member: 13254"><p>I don't know if you are trying to kind everyone else or just kidding yourself. The feds aren't suing over your recent favorite flavor of "reasonable suspension" or "bigotry" or profiling, because they know that is a very weak argument. Trust me, the talking heads have already stated profiling as on of their fears several times. They would not hesitate to use it again either, if they can demonize the proponents of SB1070.</p><p></p><p>Oh please, don't try to take credit for educating me on the constitutionality of SB1070. I stated on page 29, post 426 "<em><strong><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><span style="color: Sienna">I understand that the Constitution gives the responsibility of protecting the US to the federal government, and this may be what is used to try and declare the law unconstitutional." </span></span></strong></em> your first post on this thread wasn't until page 30, post #441. So your claim of, "<strong><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">And I mentioned it earlier than the Cowboy, with an already anwered question I asked to him.", </span></span></strong><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">is proven to be untrue.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 751777, member: 13254"] I don't know if you are trying to kind everyone else or just kidding yourself. The feds aren't suing over your recent favorite flavor of "reasonable suspension" or "bigotry" or profiling, because they know that is a very weak argument. Trust me, the talking heads have already stated profiling as on of their fears several times. They would not hesitate to use it again either, if they can demonize the proponents of SB1070. Oh please, don't try to take credit for educating me on the constitutionality of SB1070. I stated on page 29, post 426 "[I][B][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Sienna]I understand that the Constitution gives the responsibility of protecting the US to the federal government, and this may be what is used to try and declare the law unconstitutional." [/COLOR][/FONT][/B][/I] your first post on this thread wasn't until page 30, post #441. So your claim of, "[B][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Tahoma]And I mentioned it earlier than the Cowboy, with an already anwered question I asked to him.", [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Tahoma]is proven to be untrue.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
Top