Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 751791" data-attributes="member: 13254">If you read the law, I’m sure this is the first time, because now you claim you have read it, but I still doubt you have read it. If you finally decide reading it, read 13-3883 a few times. If English is your native language you need some college classes to know how to read between the sentences, the Cowboy that seems that English is his native language doesn’t know what this means, I hope you will. And no, English is not my second language it is my third one, but I consider it my first language along my native one.As I have mentioned this several times, prejudice is not the only problem with the law, but it seems that this is the thing that stirs you guys up and it’s the only one you try to debate. If you don’t know what is a “Reasonable Suspect” it’s useless for you to read SB1070, and to try to give your points in this thread. And by the way, you haven’t given any facts, you just keep guessing and saying that you read the law, but you haven’t cited it in any of the posts of the 98 pages of this thread, or at least in this post that you presume you’re giving facts.</blockquote> Since you brought my name up, I feel entitled to respond. It's not clear to me exactly what you are referring to me not understanding. Is it the "reading between the lines" or "13-3883" ? If it is the reading "between the sentences", I have already told you, I try not to read anything into things I read that just isn't there. If it is 13-3883, I understand it fine, what would you like for me to explain to you? Also, in case you are wondering, my first and only language is American English.[/QUOTE]

Verification