Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KingofBrown" data-source="post: 753436" data-attributes="member: 28771">How’s that for radical? The way you have stated it, it is extremely radical, indeed. Not even, listen, not even Tom Tancredo thinks like that. But, you’re free to have those radical views, or any other type of views. Our Founding Fathers have protected you in the Constitution to have Freedom of Expression, but watch out don’t go too radical.I invite you to read the article I placed. If you finish reading it, you’ll find it has a lot to do with illegal immigrants, too. As I’ve said it before, it doesn’t matter if it bothers or bothers you not. We can’t break our amendments just because some people feel they’re going to solve a problem by doing so, or just because they feel it won’t affect them or they’re OK with that. Because in doing so you’ll cause more challenging problems.&nbsp; Here’s an example: May be an atheist would say he/she is OK if they take away the part of the 1st Amendment where it says “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” After all he/she has no religion. But, I guess we don’t care if he/she is or not OK with that, right? Well, at least I wouldn’t care if that individual feels OK with that perception. If you want to find several examples for your radical view, just take a look at the site I have provided.Were the Founding Fathers criminals trying to protect themselves when they inserted the 4th and 5th amendments into the Bill of Rights?&nbsp; After all, nobody who hasn&#039;t done anything wrong needs to worry about being searched or being forced to testify against himself. Over the years, Americans have become accustomed to showing ID in any number of circumstances.&nbsp; Few have asked the question, &#039;Why?&#039;<a href="http://www.papersplease.org/id.html" target="_blank">http://www.papersplease.org/id.html</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="KingofBrown, post: 753436, member: 28771"] [B]How’s that for radical? The way you have stated it, it is extremely radical, indeed. Not even, listen, not even Tom Tancredo thinks like that. But, you’re free to have those radical views, or any other type of views. Our Founding Fathers have protected you in the Constitution to have Freedom of Expression, but watch out don’t go too radical. I invite you to read the article I placed. If you finish reading it, you’ll find it has a lot to do with illegal immigrants, too. As I’ve said it before, it doesn’t matter if it bothers or bothers you not. We can’t break our amendments just because some people feel they’re going to solve a problem by doing so, or just because they feel it won’t affect them or they’re OK with that. Because in doing so you’ll cause more challenging problems. Here’s an example: May be an atheist would say he/she is OK if they take away the part of the 1st Amendment where it says “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” After all he/she has no religion. But, I guess we don’t care if he/she is or not OK with that, right? Well, at least I wouldn’t care if that individual feels OK with that perception. If you want to find several examples for your radical view, just take a look at the site I have provided.[/B] Were the Founding Fathers criminals trying to protect themselves when they inserted the 4th and 5th amendments into the Bill of Rights? After all, nobody who hasn't done anything wrong needs to worry about being searched or being forced to testify against himself. Over the years, Americans have become accustomed to showing ID in any number of circumstances. Few have asked the question, 'Why?' [url]http://www.papersplease.org/id.html[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification