Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KingofBrown" data-source="post: 755966" data-attributes="member: 28771"><p><a href="http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0710/072810cdpm1.htm" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #800080">http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0710/072810cdpm1.htm</span></span></span></a></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Judge Bolton gave an injunction to the most controversial parts of the law, including the most racist. Most people in favor and against SB1070 consider it a victory from the Federal Government, since that’s what the Feds were looking for. They were looking for an injunction, which they got. The parts that were allowed were ruled under the knowledge of Judge Susan Bolton, and she didn’t consider that these parts preempted Federal Laws. So the injunction the Feds were looking for was achieved after all. And I’m glad some people in favor of SB1070 are happy with the new implementation, because the top guys are not much. Although some people do like the new law, that doesn’t mean that these passed statutes will definitely stay on the books.</span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The part I still see a bit flawed, which was passed, was the Citizen or Agency Suit Provision. But as Sexy Brewer said, “this is just the beginning of the battle.” Some other lawsuit might infringe that part. However, that provision is not as burdensome with the injunction of the key parts granted by Judge Susan Bolton.</span></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KingofBrown, post: 755966, member: 28771"] [URL="http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0710/072810cdpm1.htm"][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#800080]http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0710/072810cdpm1.htm[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/URL] [B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Judge Bolton gave an injunction to the most controversial parts of the law, including the most racist. Most people in favor and against SB1070 consider it a victory from the Federal Government, since that’s what the Feds were looking for. They were looking for an injunction, which they got. The parts that were allowed were ruled under the knowledge of Judge Susan Bolton, and she didn’t consider that these parts preempted Federal Laws. So the injunction the Feds were looking for was achieved after all. And I’m glad some people in favor of SB1070 are happy with the new implementation, because the top guys are not much. Although some people do like the new law, that doesn’t mean that these passed statutes will definitely stay on the books.[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]The part I still see a bit flawed, which was passed, was the Citizen or Agency Suit Provision. But as Sexy Brewer said, “this is just the beginning of the battle.” Some other lawsuit might infringe that part. However, that provision is not as burdensome with the injunction of the key parts granted by Judge Susan Bolton.[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Arizona's anti-imigration law...
Top