Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 757179" data-attributes="member: 12952">Law TrialONLY the US Supreme Court has Constitutional Authority to Conduct the Trial&nbsp;By Publius HuldahDoes anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers&nbsp; don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read&nbsp; it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this&nbsp; lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our&nbsp; Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:&nbsp; &nbsp; In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public&nbsp; Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the&nbsp; supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases&nbsp; before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction…
“Original” jurisdiction means the power to conduct the “trial” of the&nbsp; case (as opposed to hearing an appeal from the judgment of a lower&nbsp; court).When a federal district court judge presides over a case which the&nbsp; Constitution specifically prohibits her from hearing, and even issues a&nbsp; ruling enjoining the enforcement of a State Law, then that federal&nbsp; district court judge usurps power. She is specifically stripped – by&nbsp; Art. III, Sec. 2, clause 2 – of jurisdiction to preside over the case&nbsp; against the STATE of Arizona and against THE GOVERNOR of the STATE of&nbsp; Arizona.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 757179, member: 12952"] [B]Law Trial[/B] [B]ONLY the US Supreme Court has Constitutional Authority to Conduct the Trial By Publius Huldah[/B] Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face. Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: [INDENT] In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction… [/INDENT] “Original” jurisdiction means the power to conduct the “trial” of the case (as opposed to hearing an appeal from the judgment of a lower court). When a federal district court judge presides over a case which the Constitution specifically prohibits her from hearing, and even issues a ruling enjoining the enforcement of a State Law, then that federal district court judge usurps power. She is specifically stripped – by Art. III, Sec. 2, clause 2 – of jurisdiction to preside over the case against the STATE of Arizona and against THE GOVERNOR of the STATE of Arizona. [/QUOTE]

Verification