Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 836705" data-attributes="member: 13254"> Look yourself. &quot;overstayed tourist visas and now in country illegally 41%, overstayed student visas and now in country illegally 29%,overstayed work visas and now in country illegally 19%&quot; are not the ones shooting ranchers, smuggling drugs, soaking up public assistance money in boarder states (as well as others) . I don&#039;t give a flip, if we cut out the 11% it damn sure would make a dent in the over all problem. All this crap you just posted may all be true, does that mean the problem be ignored and tell everyone &quot;Welcome to the USA&quot;? BS! ALL of these areas need to be addressed, yesterday. What makes you think that anyone here didn&#039;t know that the southern border was the only point of entry of illegal aliens. I&#039;ve seen that claim from no one. So who is the raving maroon here? When I say &quot;protecting the border&quot; I mean ALL boarders, whether that be physical ground borders, land and water or the borders crossed in the air. Your right Reagan did that, how has that worked out ? Not so good as it appears. Reagan also talked about stopping the illegal migration along with that amnesty, but it never happened and that is the fault of every president since him. If they, the government, had done as they were supposed to ever since Reagan home land security wouldn&#039;t be handling all the cases they are today and we wouldn&#039;t be having this debate. If the INS and now DHS had been doing their job on overstayed visa violators all along, the remaining 11% would be a snap to solve.&nbsp;The republicans I am talking about are the ones of today not in the past and you know it. Just curious, Mr. Knowitall, of the 19 overstayed visa terrorists, what were their inter dates to the US and when did their visas expire, do you have any evidence that Bush made any directions to the INS concerning overstayed visas? </blockquote>

[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 836705, member: 13254"] [COLOR=sienna][I][B] Look yourself. [/B][/I][/COLOR] "[B]overstayed tourist visas and now in country illegally 41%, overstayed student visas and now in country illegally 29%,overstayed work visas and now in country illegally 19%[/B]" [COLOR=sienna][I][B] are not the ones shooting ranchers, smuggling drugs, soaking up public assistance money in boarder states (as well as others) . I don't give a flip, if we cut out the 11% it damn sure would make a dent in the over all problem. All this crap you just posted may all be true, does that mean the problem be ignored and tell everyone "Welcome to the USA"? BS! ALL of these areas need to be addressed, yesterday. What makes you think that anyone here didn't know that the southern border was the only point of entry of illegal aliens. I've seen that claim from no one. So who is the raving maroon here? When I say "protecting the border" I mean ALL boarders, whether that be physical ground borders, land and water or the borders crossed in the air. [/B][/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=sienna][I][B] Your right Reagan did that, how has that worked out ? Not so good as it appears. Reagan also talked about stopping the illegal migration along with that amnesty, but it never happened and that is the fault of every president since him. If they, the government, had done as they were supposed to ever since Reagan home land security wouldn't be handling all the cases they are today and we wouldn't be having this debate. If the INS and now DHS had been doing their job on overstayed visa violators all along, the remaining 11% would be a snap to solve. The republicans I am talking about are the ones of today not in the past and you know it. Just curious, Mr. Knowitall, of the 19 overstayed visa terrorists, what were their inter dates to the US and when did their visas expire, do you have any evidence that Bush made any directions to the INS concerning overstayed visas? [/B][/I][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification