Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Assigned Work???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mugarolla" data-source="post: 2732754" data-attributes="member: 8481"><p>He was paid at his package driver rate. But during this portion of his day, he was performing air shuttle work covered under Article 40 of the NMUPSA.</p><p></p><p>You seem to like me quoting the contract, so I will</p><p></p><p><em>Article 40</em></p><p><em>Section 1</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>9. Movement of air packages to airports and other locations such</em></p><p><em>as service centers, UPS buildings and driver meet points. Shuttle</em></p><p><em>work currently performed by regular full time drivers shall be</em></p><p><em>excluded. Should a regular full-time driver vacate a position which</em></p><p><em>includes air shuttle work, that job shall either be rebid as it previously</em></p><p><em>existed and continue to be paid at the regular driver rate or</em></p><p><em>the air shuttle work may be combined with other air work to create</em></p><p><em>one (1) or more full-time air or full-time combination job(s) paid in</em></p><p><em>accordance with Section 6 below. In no event shall such shuttle</em></p><p><em>work be assigned to a part time air driver.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Correct. But air shuttle work is not covered in the CRSA, so it does not apply.</p><p></p><p>If air shuttle work was covered in the CRSA, I would agree with you. But you cannot say that driver helpers are covered in the CRSA, so we are going to apply this language to shuttle drivers covered under Article 40 of the NMUPSA.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Condescending? well, maybe just a little. I'm sorry.......</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You could locate a Teamster decision regarding UPS not having to pay air driver rate, or helper rate, to an employee unloading a plane at a remote airport.</p><p></p><p>But it has been fun kicking it around.</p><p></p><p>I will never fault anyone for expressing an opinion, even if I don't agree with it. That is the purpose of a debate. Me trying to show you that I'm right, and you trying to show me that you are right.</p><p></p><p>In the end, our opinions don't matter. Sounds to me like the union already made a decision on this issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mugarolla, post: 2732754, member: 8481"] He was paid at his package driver rate. But during this portion of his day, he was performing air shuttle work covered under Article 40 of the NMUPSA. You seem to like me quoting the contract, so I will [I]Article 40 Section 1 9. Movement of air packages to airports and other locations such as service centers, UPS buildings and driver meet points. Shuttle work currently performed by regular full time drivers shall be excluded. Should a regular full-time driver vacate a position which includes air shuttle work, that job shall either be rebid as it previously existed and continue to be paid at the regular driver rate or the air shuttle work may be combined with other air work to create one (1) or more full-time air or full-time combination job(s) paid in accordance with Section 6 below. In no event shall such shuttle work be assigned to a part time air driver.[/I] Correct. But air shuttle work is not covered in the CRSA, so it does not apply. If air shuttle work was covered in the CRSA, I would agree with you. But you cannot say that driver helpers are covered in the CRSA, so we are going to apply this language to shuttle drivers covered under Article 40 of the NMUPSA. Condescending? well, maybe just a little. I'm sorry....... You could locate a Teamster decision regarding UPS not having to pay air driver rate, or helper rate, to an employee unloading a plane at a remote airport. But it has been fun kicking it around. I will never fault anyone for expressing an opinion, even if I don't agree with it. That is the purpose of a debate. Me trying to show you that I'm right, and you trying to show me that you are right. In the end, our opinions don't matter. Sounds to me like the union already made a decision on this issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Assigned Work???
Top
