Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 2790240" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>To his credit he would not deny the existence  of the endless supply of contradiction and double standards born out of a unilaterally drafted and implemented contractor operating agreement whose terms XG freely admits  that it doesn't consider to be binding upon itself. Then again it considers the matter to be in their words......."subjective".  Subjected to what? What definition? What criteria? What past practices? Perhaps serving in your current capacity as fourth assistant vice president for nonessential operations you should certainly be able to put this matter in a clearer perspective.</p></blockquote><p></p>