Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Atheists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1058472" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Actually Pope Benedict is <a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/22/pope-benedict-disputes-jesus-date-of-birth/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">questioning some of the nativity narrative</span></a> already. This on top of the Church's <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/4588289/The-Vatican-claims-Darwins-theory-of-evolution-is-compatible-with-Christianity.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">acceptance of evolution</span></a> as being compatible with Christianity (and they would be right too) so seems to me that some of the atheist debate is becoming accepted.</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/surprised.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":surprised:" title="Surprised :surprised:" data-shortname=":surprised:" /> The world is going to hell, slowly but surely! <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p></p><p>More important, I think both atheism and christainity greatly benefit as the Church enters into these discussions and begins to clear the field of non textual beliefs such as animals at the nativity. I'd like to see what they have to say about the contradictions between <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+2&version=NIV" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">Matthew Chapter 2</span></a> where upon Jesus is born and then is taken to Egypt to escape Herod before returning to Nazareth and <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+2&version=NIV" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">Luke Chapter 2</span></a> that has Jesus is born, taken to Jerusalem and presented and then returned to Nazareth. </p><p></p><p>Another discrepancy is the Quirinius, the governor of Syria named in Luke took office after 6 CE and Herod mentioned in Matthew died in 4 BCE. Since Pope Benedict is going with an earlier Jesus birth, is he fully discounting the Luke account? I may get his book to see if he addresses this difference and how he reconciles it.</p><p></p><p>Not going to be popular among traditionalists but I applaud Pope Benedict for clearing the animals from the barn so to speak.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1058472, member: 2189"] Actually Pope Benedict is [URL='http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/22/pope-benedict-disputes-jesus-date-of-birth/'][COLOR=#ff0000]questioning some of the nativity narrative[/COLOR][/URL] already. This on top of the Church's [URL='http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/4588289/The-Vatican-claims-Darwins-theory-of-evolution-is-compatible-with-Christianity.html'][COLOR=#ff0000]acceptance of evolution[/COLOR][/URL] as being compatible with Christianity (and they would be right too) so seems to me that some of the atheist debate is becoming accepted. :surprised: The world is going to hell, slowly but surely! :happy-very: More important, I think both atheism and christainity greatly benefit as the Church enters into these discussions and begins to clear the field of non textual beliefs such as animals at the nativity. I'd like to see what they have to say about the contradictions between [URL='http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+2&version=NIV'][COLOR=#ff0000]Matthew Chapter 2[/COLOR][/URL] where upon Jesus is born and then is taken to Egypt to escape Herod before returning to Nazareth and [URL='http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+2&version=NIV'][COLOR=#ff0000]Luke Chapter 2[/COLOR][/URL] that has Jesus is born, taken to Jerusalem and presented and then returned to Nazareth. Another discrepancy is the Quirinius, the governor of Syria named in Luke took office after 6 CE and Herod mentioned in Matthew died in 4 BCE. Since Pope Benedict is going with an earlier Jesus birth, is he fully discounting the Luke account? I may get his book to see if he addresses this difference and how he reconciles it. Not going to be popular among traditionalists but I applaud Pope Benedict for clearing the animals from the barn so to speak. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Atheists
Top