Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Barney Frank
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 909749" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>If they were so profitable why did they go under?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If it worked so well why was there a need to strengthen the regulations in 1995?</p><p></p><p>No that wasn't the paper. I think it was a 1994 or 1995 paper. I'll look for it if I get a chance but it is not central to my argument. It is interesting because they started the study to prove they needed to strengthen the regulations but came up some unexpected results. It was, I believe a national study. Your paper actually works for my view better. Your paper basically claims that from 77-92 all the government regulation didn't help anything and possibly made things worse. I didn't have time to look at the actual statistics to see what they really said just the summary but it would be interesting to see what method they used and what percent confidence interval they had. My position is steady and remains as one that government intervention normally has unintended consequences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 909749, member: 8259"] If they were so profitable why did they go under? If it worked so well why was there a need to strengthen the regulations in 1995? No that wasn't the paper. I think it was a 1994 or 1995 paper. I'll look for it if I get a chance but it is not central to my argument. It is interesting because they started the study to prove they needed to strengthen the regulations but came up some unexpected results. It was, I believe a national study. Your paper actually works for my view better. Your paper basically claims that from 77-92 all the government regulation didn't help anything and possibly made things worse. I didn't have time to look at the actual statistics to see what they really said just the summary but it would be interesting to see what method they used and what percent confidence interval they had. My position is steady and remains as one that government intervention normally has unintended consequences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Barney Frank
Top