Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 4050415" data-attributes="member: 68849">Understood, it does not prohibit them however. I have read it and understand exactly what Mueller did and how he actually skirted what he is proposing to uphold. Read it for yourself. You are relying on what you have heard.You clowns use his report to accuse a man that cannot defend himself. This report does accuse, by innuendo and slight of hand and by the express wording,&nbsp;&quot;Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.&quot;Exoneration has never been the job of a prosecutor, his job is to prosecute. Defense counsels sole role is to advocate for the accused, it is their job to seek exoneration.In not exonerating, the prosecutor failed to do a job that is contradictory to his mission.The report should have been a few sentences to comply with what Mueller says he was trying to if he was truthful.&quot;We do not have evidence of crime (s) to secure a successful prosecution at trial.&quot;&nbsp; Read it, and the footnotes if you truly want to understand it.&nbsp; Don&#039;t rely on talking points.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 4050415, member: 68849"] Understood, it does not prohibit them however. I have read it and understand exactly what Mueller did and how he actually skirted what he is proposing to uphold. Read it for yourself. You are relying on what you have heard. You clowns use his report to accuse a man that cannot defend himself. This report does accuse, by innuendo and slight of hand and by the express wording, "Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." Exoneration has never been the job of a prosecutor, his job is to prosecute. Defense counsels sole role is to advocate for the accused, it is their job to seek exoneration. In not exonerating, the prosecutor failed to do a job that is contradictory to his mission. The report should have been a few sentences to comply with what Mueller says he was trying to if he was truthful. "We do not have evidence of crime (s) to secure a successful prosecution at trial." Read it, and the footnotes if you truly want to understand it. Don't rely on talking points. [/QUOTE]

Verification