Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3265599" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>What&#039;s interesting is the Clinton campaign paid for a dossier from Fusion GPS which also had ties to members of the FBI who were involved in investigating Clinton for improprieties.&nbsp; And said dossier has been debunked but appears to have been used to get a FISA warrant to spy on members of Trump&#039;s campaign team.&nbsp; Since we&#039;re talking about possible misdeeds during the campaign it&#039;s only fair that both sides be scrutinized for wrongdoing.&nbsp; But all I&#039;m hearing is only Trump should be investigated because he won, that no matter what Clinton did it doesn&#039;t matter because she&#039;s over and out.&nbsp; Still haven&#039;t seen anything concrete on Trump by an investigator that Dems say is of the highest integrity and will get to the bottom of any illegality.&nbsp; But there does seem to be quite a bit to have emerged about Clinton to support a special prosecutor to look into allegations.&nbsp; If criminal acts took place then they need to be exposed and prosecuted, no matter which side of the fence you&#039;re on.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; Going forward we want confidence that everyone is playing by the rules.&nbsp; Transparency.&nbsp; If we demand that our police maintain high ethical standards or be prosecuted for misdeeds then should we not demand the same of our leaders?&nbsp; If there&#039;s nothing there worthy of prosecution then settle the matter with a proper investigation.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3265599, member: 24302"] What's interesting is the Clinton campaign paid for a dossier from Fusion GPS which also had ties to members of the FBI who were involved in investigating Clinton for improprieties. And said dossier has been debunked but appears to have been used to get a FISA warrant to spy on members of Trump's campaign team. Since we're talking about possible misdeeds during the campaign it's only fair that both sides be scrutinized for wrongdoing. But all I'm hearing is only Trump should be investigated because he won, that no matter what Clinton did it doesn't matter because she's over and out. Still haven't seen anything concrete on Trump by an investigator that Dems say is of the highest integrity and will get to the bottom of any illegality. But there does seem to be quite a bit to have emerged about Clinton to support a special prosecutor to look into allegations. If criminal acts took place then they need to be exposed and prosecuted, no matter which side of the fence you're on. Why? Going forward we want confidence that everyone is playing by the rules. Transparency. If we demand that our police maintain high ethical standards or be prosecuted for misdeeds then should we not demand the same of our leaders? If there's nothing there worthy of prosecution then settle the matter with a proper investigation. [/QUOTE]

Verification