Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="browned out" data-source="post: 3980362" data-attributes="member: 8105">Hoffa/Taylor/Hall allowed it for at least three reasons.&nbsp; 1.&nbsp; To penalize the members of W. PA.&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.&nbsp; To continue demoralizing and increasing the apathy of the entire membership.&nbsp; 3.&nbsp; To protect the leadership of 243 and W. PA.&nbsp; &nbsp; The leaders of 243 and W. PA need to be electable.&nbsp;&nbsp; 243 and W. PA knew this would be crammed thru so they recommended a NO vote.&nbsp; &nbsp; So;&nbsp; come election time;&nbsp;&nbsp; the 243 and W. PA corrupt, colluding, Hoffa/Taylor/Hall loyal crew will attempt to tell the members whose lives were affected negatively by this &quot;CBA&quot;......&#039;we told you all it was a bad deal,&nbsp; we recommended voting no, the IBT forced it thru.&nbsp; We had nothing to do with it&#039;The criminals in 243 and W. PA will be voted out.When the pieces of work (Hoffa/Taylor) state that 243&#039;s GOALS DEMANDS ARE UNOBTAINABLE;&nbsp; that is ludicrous.One of &#039;demands&#039; was to CLARIFY RPCDS RIGHTS.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The demand was not to give RPCDs the right to bump 22.4s.&nbsp; &nbsp; The demand was to answer the question.Putting 40% or more of all RPCD&#039;s income in doubt is a Major change in pay and working conditions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="browned out, post: 3980362, member: 8105"] Hoffa/Taylor/Hall allowed it for at least three reasons. 1. To penalize the members of W. PA. 2. To continue demoralizing and increasing the apathy of the entire membership. 3. To protect the leadership of 243 and W. PA. The leaders of 243 and W. PA need to be electable. 243 and W. PA knew this would be crammed thru so they recommended a NO vote. So; come election time; the 243 and W. PA corrupt, colluding, Hoffa/Taylor/Hall loyal crew will attempt to tell the members whose lives were affected negatively by this "CBA"......'we told you all it was a bad deal, we recommended voting no, the IBT forced it thru. We had nothing to do with it' The criminals in 243 and W. PA will be voted out. When the pieces of work (Hoffa/Taylor) state that 243's GOALS DEMANDS ARE UNOBTAINABLE; that is ludicrous. One of 'demands' was to CLARIFY RPCDS RIGHTS. The demand was not to give RPCDs the right to bump 22.4s. The demand was to answer the question. Putting 40% or more of all RPCD's income in doubt is a Major change in pay and working conditions. [/QUOTE]

Verification