Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Superteeth2478" data-source="post: 3983602" data-attributes="member: 73024">Are you kidding? Just the most recent one is where you post a picture of James R. Hoffa&#039;s quote (which is irrelevant in this situation, and NOT what James R. Hoffa had in mind when saying it) in response to supplementals being jammed up the voting membership&#039;s asses...more and more evidence is pointing to that rumor being true, and that&#039;s all you have to say about it? As if this is a &quot;time for agreement&quot;? As if UPS being at it&#039;s most profitable point in history and having offered a WORSE agreement to be put to the vote is something that the membership should look at and say &quot;This is a time for compromise, a time for agreement?&quot;And I knew you would take my unwillingness to go back and quote all the times you&#039;ve ignored me or sidetracked the conversation when you had no legitimate arguments as evidence that it never happened...but like I said, I&#039;m not the only one who has noticed that.And UPS&#039;s opinion of the union employees that voted NO shouldn&#039;t be that they&#039;re pusillanimous. But UPS&#039;s opinion of the negotiating committees and Teamster &quot;leadership&quot; that is accepting bribes for being sellouts surely can&#039;t be good...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Superteeth2478, post: 3983602, member: 73024"] Are you kidding? Just the most recent one is where you post a picture of James R. Hoffa's quote (which is irrelevant in this situation, and NOT what James R. Hoffa had in mind when saying it) in response to supplementals being jammed up the voting membership's asses...more and more evidence is pointing to that rumor being true, and that's all you have to say about it? As if this is a "time for agreement"? As if UPS being at it's most profitable point in history and having offered a WORSE agreement to be put to the vote is something that the membership should look at and say "This is a time for compromise, a time for agreement?" And I knew you would take my unwillingness to go back and quote all the times you've ignored me or sidetracked the conversation when you had no legitimate arguments as evidence that it never happened...but like I said, I'm not the only one who has noticed that. And UPS's opinion of the union employees that voted NO shouldn't be that they're pusillanimous. But UPS's opinion of the negotiating committees and Teamster "leadership" that is accepting bribes for being sellouts surely can't be good... [/QUOTE]

Verification