Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 5337105" data-attributes="member: 63706">What is there to know? That the entire theory is based on guesses about past temperatures with absolutely zero way to verify?They use ice core samples to create a record. They don&#039;t seem to realize that there could have been 100&#039;s or thousands of years, many multiple times throughout history where the temps were high enough to have not left a record in the ice. The fact that their methods don&#039;t show this is more telling that it suffers from observation bias. They have zero meaningful way to determine that the climate we are experiencing is in any way out of the ordinary. They start with the conclusion that co2 concentrations in the atmosphere increase temperatures. Then they use circular logic to say that the temperatures must be higher because increased CO2, which means CO2 increases temperature.The people pushing the narrative are intent on using it as a pretense to kill off the population. It&#039;s obvious when they have people write books about the age of pandemics due to climate change, they test scenarios for a particular virus, they create the virus in a lab, then &quot;accidentally&quot; release it. It had nothing to do with climate change, but passive consumers of information accept the narrative because someone predicted pandemics and pre-blamed them on climate change.It&#039;s a combination of some very old scams. Too bad people don&#039;t study history.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 5337105, member: 63706"] What is there to know? That the entire theory is based on guesses about past temperatures with absolutely zero way to verify? They use ice core samples to create a record. They don't seem to realize that there could have been 100's or thousands of years, many multiple times throughout history where the temps were high enough to have not left a record in the ice. The fact that their methods don't show this is more telling that it suffers from observation bias. They have zero meaningful way to determine that the climate we are experiencing is in any way out of the ordinary. They start with the conclusion that co2 concentrations in the atmosphere increase temperatures. Then they use circular logic to say that the temperatures must be higher because increased CO2, which means CO2 increases temperature. The people pushing the narrative are intent on using it as a pretense to kill off the population. It's obvious when they have people write books about the age of pandemics due to climate change, they test scenarios for a particular virus, they create the virus in a lab, then "accidentally" release it. It had nothing to do with climate change, but passive consumers of information accept the narrative because someone predicted pandemics and pre-blamed them on climate change. It's a combination of some very old scams. Too bad people don't study history. [/QUOTE]

Verification