Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4638662" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>Well, you adjusted it down from 400k by the end of the year, so that's a step in the right direction. Locking down healthy, low risk people is putting high risk people at more risk. When percentages don't sound as scary, you use raw numbers. Guess what. When your population is 331,000,000 you have a lot of people in poor health who are susceptible to new viruses. If we had targeted our efforts at protecting them, instead of a one-size-fits-all shotgun approach, we might have had a better outcome. But since our elected officials decided to use this as a reason to expand their power instead of protecting the vulnerable we have the results we do. Very sad.</p></blockquote><p></p>