Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4721961" data-attributes="member: 63706">I&#039;ve questioned the existence of the virus. Based on everything I&#039;ve read, it doesn&#039;t seem like the facts for the existence of a sars-cov-2 are very strong. All I&#039;ve seen is that China claims to have isolated it and sequenced the genome, but information from China must be taken with a very large grain of salt. Then I read that they isolated it in S. Korea. Ok, a little more plausible. But why haven&#039;t more labs independently verified? More importantly, why hasn&#039;t the CDC? There is talk about new strains and mutations, but how does anyone know if they aren&#039;t being isolated or sequenced? The information may be out there, but the way it&#039;s being presented, it&#039;s like we are expected to assume that these things are being done. Like questioning the official narrative, which is what journalists are supposed to do, is not allowed. I won&#039;t go so far as to say that the pandemic is a hoax, or that the virus doesn&#039;t exist. I feel the circumstantial evidence is strong enough. But, to expect people to be ok with going to the lengths we have been forced to go without quality investigation and presentation of hard facts is unacceptable. It calls the way in which the situation is being covered and reported on into question, and gives me plenty of reason to be skeptical of anything being said about the pandemic.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4721961, member: 63706"] I've questioned the existence of the virus. Based on everything I've read, it doesn't seem like the facts for the existence of a sars-cov-2 are very strong. All I've seen is that China claims to have isolated it and sequenced the genome, but information from China must be taken with a very large grain of salt. Then I read that they isolated it in S. Korea. Ok, a little more plausible. But why haven't more labs independently verified? More importantly, why hasn't the CDC? There is talk about new strains and mutations, but how does anyone know if they aren't being isolated or sequenced? The information may be out there, but the way it's being presented, it's like we are expected to assume that these things are being done. Like questioning the official narrative, which is what journalists are supposed to do, is not allowed. I won't go so far as to say that the pandemic is a hoax, or that the virus doesn't exist. I feel the circumstantial evidence is strong enough. But, to expect people to be ok with going to the lengths we have been forced to go without quality investigation and presentation of hard facts is unacceptable. It calls the way in which the situation is being covered and reported on into question, and gives me plenty of reason to be skeptical of anything being said about the pandemic. [/QUOTE]

Verification