Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="btrlov" data-source="post: 4997098" data-attributes="member: 29173">&quot;public health&quot; and &quot;reasonable regulations&quot; are probably defined too broadly in that case and not enough&nbsp; for modern society. The Court should probably narrow the scope a little furtherI think, consulting with medical community, civil liberties groups and other stake holders........ the SCOUTUS will have to take this issue up again and come up with a&nbsp; &quot;Vaccine test&quot; or a &quot;Public health intervention&quot; test. Basically, like roe, a series of checkpoints/metrics that is used to balance the interest of public health vs the interest of indvidual....The intervention should also be time limited to address the crises at hand and not be &quot;endless&quot;.Another words the scope of the medical intervention should be congruent with the scope of the public health issue -all within the purview of constitutional individual liberties.&nbsp; That way any major public health mandate would have to be legally sufficent to be enforceable. That way we avoid arbritary&nbsp; mandates for various public health issues</blockquote>

[QUOTE="btrlov, post: 4997098, member: 29173"] "public health" and "reasonable regulations" are probably defined too broadly in that case and not enough for modern society. The Court should probably narrow the scope a little further I think, consulting with medical community, civil liberties groups and other stake holders........ the SCOUTUS will have to take this issue up again and come up with a "Vaccine test" or a "Public health intervention" test. Basically, like roe, a series of checkpoints/metrics that is used to balance the interest of public health vs the interest of indvidual....The intervention should also be time limited to address the crises at hand and not be "endless".Another words the scope of the medical intervention should be congruent with the scope of the public health issue -all within the purview of constitutional individual liberties. That way any major public health mandate would have to be legally sufficent to be enforceable. That way we avoid arbritary mandates for various public health issues [/QUOTE]

Verification