Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fedx" data-source="post: 5018551" data-attributes="member: 64891"><p>Your logic is like saying in the 1870s &quot;nobody is discriminating against blacks in the south, they can move to a state that gives them more freedom&quot;.&nbsp; A person who has worked at their job for years should not be required to look for a new job over a new policy (that was never in effect when they were hired) that says they need to put a mrna technology in their body.&nbsp; And your number of 600K dead from covid is waaaaaay overinflated.&nbsp; They counted people who died in car accidents as dying from covid.&nbsp; As I said earlier, covid has an overall 99.98% survivability.&nbsp; You want everyone to get the shot to get 99.99% survivability.&nbsp; That&#039;s not a good enough reason or improvement to warrant the intrusion.&nbsp; Now if covid had a 92% survivability and this vaccines brought it up to 99.99%, then it might be a different story, but that&#039;s not the case in this instance.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="fedx, post: 5018551, member: 64891"] Your logic is like saying in the 1870s "nobody is discriminating against blacks in the south, they can move to a state that gives them more freedom". A person who has worked at their job for years should not be required to look for a new job over a new policy (that was never in effect when they were hired) that says they need to put a mrna technology in their body. And your number of 600K dead from covid is waaaaaay overinflated. They counted people who died in car accidents as dying from covid. As I said earlier, covid has an overall 99.98% survivability. You want everyone to get the shot to get 99.99% survivability. That's not a good enough reason or improvement to warrant the intrusion. Now if covid had a 92% survivability and this vaccines brought it up to 99.99%, then it might be a different story, but that's not the case in this instance. [/QUOTE]

Verification