Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 6160442" data-attributes="member: 24302">First off Acosta wasn&#039;t the judge.&nbsp; He was the U.S. District Attorney for south Florida.&nbsp; Second, do you have proof that Epstein was a Mossad asset?&nbsp; Let&#039;s be totally honest here.&nbsp; Trump did a lot of things that were immoral concerning women.&nbsp; It wouldn&#039;t surprise me at all if he did nail a 17 year old Epstein supplied him.&nbsp; But I do know Trump had a falling out with Epstein long before becoming President.&nbsp; But you guys are laser focused on Trump when apparently the vast majority of Epstein&#039;s clients were prominent Democrats.&nbsp; You disregard that Merrick Garland had everything available to him that Bondi has yet did nothing.&nbsp; It does look like a cover up.&nbsp; It most likely is.&nbsp; I just have a hard time getting excited about it when there were huge political scandals that involved major Democrats getting filthy rich by selling access yet y&#039;all denied, defended, ignored it.&nbsp; So who gives a rat&#039;s ass?&nbsp; If there isn&#039;t proof that these girls had guns to their heads, weren&#039;t paid serious money, were under 16, especially if they were prepubescent, then you&#039;re getting excited about something that takes place in the back seats of cars and in motel rooms nationwide every Saturday night.&nbsp; Only because you hate Trump with a passion and grasp at anything you think might bring him down. P.S. DURRRRRRRR Donald Trump!!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 6160442, member: 24302"] First off Acosta wasn't the judge. He was the U.S. District Attorney for south Florida. Second, do you have proof that Epstein was a Mossad asset? Let's be totally honest here. Trump did a lot of things that were immoral concerning women. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he did nail a 17 year old Epstein supplied him. But I do know Trump had a falling out with Epstein long before becoming President. But you guys are laser focused on Trump when apparently the vast majority of Epstein's clients were prominent Democrats. You disregard that Merrick Garland had everything available to him that Bondi has yet did nothing. It does look like a cover up. It most likely is. I just have a hard time getting excited about it when there were huge political scandals that involved major Democrats getting filthy rich by selling access yet y'all denied, defended, ignored it. So who gives a rat's ass? If there isn't proof that these girls had guns to their heads, weren't paid serious money, were under 16, especially if they were prepubescent, then you're getting excited about something that takes place in the back seats of cars and in motel rooms nationwide every Saturday night. Only because you hate Trump with a passion and grasp at anything you think might bring him down. P.S. DURRRRRRRR Donald Trump!!! [/QUOTE]

Verification