Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 930223" data-attributes="member: 12952">Four different groups have filed suit in GA. , all claiming their rights under GA law to challenge bhos being on the GA state ballot. bhos&#039; lawyer tried to squash it without supplying any facts ( sound familiar ), but the judge ruled against him. It&#039;s now in the discovery phase, meaning everyone has to comply or be subject to jail time.Only one group issued a subpoena for bhos to appear, most of the others are claiming that since he &quot;released&quot; his BC , he knows that he is unfit to hold office ( something about his named father not being a USA citizen , but a British subject ).The <a href="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30563" target="_blank">order</a> from Judge Malihi reads, in part: Defendant, President&nbsp; Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the&nbsp; office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to&nbsp; quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January&nbsp; 26, 2012. In support of his&nbsp; motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him&nbsp; to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a&nbsp; hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.&nbsp; However, Defendant fails to provide any&nbsp; legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend.&nbsp;&nbsp; Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to&nbsp; attend a Court hearing.&nbsp; This may be correct.&nbsp; But Defendant has failed&nbsp; to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is&nbsp; “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony…[is] irrelevant,&nbsp; immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or&nbsp; presentation in the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the&nbsp; subpoena should not be enforced…It would be a real shame if bhos&#039; name was removed from the GA ballot , why it may even serve as catalyst for other challenges in several states to do likewise.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 930223, member: 12952"] Four different groups have filed suit in GA. , all claiming their rights under GA law to challenge bhos being on the GA state ballot. bhos' lawyer tried to squash it without supplying any facts ( sound familiar ), but the judge ruled against him. It's now in the discovery phase, meaning everyone has to comply or be subject to jail time. Only one group issued a subpoena for bhos to appear, most of the others are claiming that since he "released" his BC , he knows that he is unfit to hold office ( something about his named father not being a USA citizen , but a British subject ). The [URL="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30563"]order[/URL] from Judge Malihi reads, in part: Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012. In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony…[is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation in the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced… It would be a real shame if bhos' name was removed from the GA ballot , why it may even serve as catalyst for other challenges in several states to do likewise. [/QUOTE]

Verification