Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 5377800" data-attributes="member: 58700">not what the supreme court ruled n Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, the Supreme Court set forth the constitutional basis for the President&#039;s privileges for confidential communications: &quot;Unless [the President] can give his advisers some assurance of confidentiality, a President could not expect to receive the full and frank submissions of facts and opinions upon which effective discharge of his duties depends.&quot; 433 U.S. at 448-49. The Court cited the precedent of the Constitutional Convention, the records of which were &quot;sealed for more than 30 years after the Convention.&quot; Id. at 447 n.11. Based on those precedents and principles, the Court ruled that constitutionally based privileges available to a President &quot;survive[] the individual President&#039;s tenure.&quot; Id. at 449. The Court also held that a former President, although no longer a Government official, may assert constitutionally based privileges with respect to his Administration&#039;s Presidential records, and expressly rejected the argument that &quot;only an incumbent President can assert the privilege of the Presidency.&quot; Id. at 448.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="newfie, post: 5377800, member: 58700"] not what the supreme court ruled n [I]Nixon v. Administrator of General Services[/I], the Supreme Court set forth the constitutional basis for the President's privileges for confidential communications: "Unless [the President] can give his advisers some assurance of confidentiality, a President could not expect to receive the full and frank submissions of facts and opinions upon which effective discharge of his duties depends." 433 U.S. at 448-49. The Court cited the precedent of the Constitutional Convention, the records of which were "sealed for more than 30 years after the Convention." Id. at 447 n.11. [B]Based on those precedents and principles, the Court ruled that constitutionally based privileges available to a President "survive[] the individual President's tenure." Id. at 449. The Court also held that a former President, although no longer a Government official, may assert constitutionally based privileges with respect to his Administration's Presidential records, and expressly rejected the argument that "only an incumbent President can assert the privilege of the Presidency." Id. at 448.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification