Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 5378339" data-attributes="member: 58700">If trump tries to keep the watergate tapes I&#039;ll agree with youNixon also argued in the case presented that he had constitutional rights to his documents.&nbsp; The supreme court agreed and agreed that he did not lose those rights as an ex president.since then every president and the archives have fought and argued over ownership.Trump is the only president to be raided while he undergoes that process.your cult keeps trying to defend glaring abuses of law and constitution.the constitution is clear&nbsp; that former presidents do have certain rights that no one else has and the constitution does not list a trump exception in the wording.again.&nbsp;Based on those precedents and principles, the Court ruled that constitutionally based privileges available to a President &quot;survive[] the individual President&#039;s tenure.&quot; Id. at 449. The Court also held that a former President, although no longer a Government official, may assert constitutionally based privileges with respect to his Administration&#039;s Presidential records, and expressly rejected the argument that &quot;only an incumbent President can assert the privilege of the Presidency.&quot; Id. at 448.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="newfie, post: 5378339, member: 58700"] If trump tries to keep the watergate tapes I'll agree with you Nixon also argued in the case presented that he had constitutional rights to his documents. The supreme court agreed and agreed that he did not lose those rights as an ex president. since then every president and the archives have fought and argued over ownership. Trump is the only president to be raided while he undergoes that process. your cult keeps trying to defend glaring abuses of law and constitution. the constitution is clear that former presidents do have certain rights that no one else has and the constitution does not list a trump exception in the wording. again. [B]Based on those precedents and principles, the Court ruled that constitutionally based privileges available to a President "survive[] the individual President's tenure." Id. at 449. The Court also held that a former President, although no longer a Government official, may assert constitutionally based privileges with respect to his Administration's Presidential records, and expressly rejected the argument that "only an incumbent President can assert the privilege of the Presidency." Id. at 448.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification