Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
FBI Raids Mar-a-lago
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 5386960" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>I really have no clue what you think this means.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/aug/22/tapes-stored-bill-clintons-sock-drawer-could-affec/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"Judge Jackson ruled that the tapes belonged to Mr. Clinton, even though the discussions included a broad range of presidential matters. The court ruled that the National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used <strong>his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.</strong>"</p><p></p><p>"Mr. Fitton said the 2012 ruling against Judicial Watch involving the Clinton tapes establishes that <strong>the president, not the National Archives, has the authority to declare whether records are personal."</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 5386960, member: 63706"] I really have no clue what you think this means. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/aug/22/tapes-stored-bill-clintons-sock-drawer-could-affec/[/URL] "Judge Jackson ruled that the tapes belonged to Mr. Clinton, even though the discussions included a broad range of presidential matters. The court ruled that the National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used [B]his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.[/B]" "Mr. Fitton said the 2012 ruling against Judicial Watch involving the Clinton tapes establishes that [B]the president, not the National Archives, has the authority to declare whether records are personal."[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
FBI Raids Mar-a-lago
Top
