Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 4485382" data-attributes="member: 58386">XG as a matter of company policy refuses to negotiate with a&nbsp; contractors legal counsel. In the early days given that you had little money at risk you could simply walk away with minimal economic loss and thereby they couldn&#039;t be controlled. So many did walk away. Today with many times more money at risk a contractor has no greater access to due process now than he did back then but due to the fact that they have basically their entire future on the line XG enjoys an even higher degree of control then in prior years.It&#039;s like a poker game where you put your money in the pot but you&#039;re not dealt a set of cards. You&#039;re not playing with the house money. The house is playing with your money. And not only is the house playing playing with your money every time it thinks that it&#039;s not going to win the hand it simply changes the rules to make certain that it will.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 4485382, member: 58386"] XG as a matter of company policy refuses to negotiate with a contractors legal counsel. In the early days given that you had little money at risk you could simply walk away with minimal economic loss and thereby they couldn't be controlled. So many did walk away. Today with many times more money at risk a contractor has no greater access to due process now than he did back then but due to the fact that they have basically their entire future on the line XG enjoys an even higher degree of control then in prior years. It's like a poker game where you put your money in the pot but you're not dealt a set of cards. You're not playing with the house money. The house is playing with your money. And not only is the house playing playing with your money every time it thinks that it's not going to win the hand it simply changes the rules to make certain that it will. [/QUOTE]

Verification