Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 2614032" data-attributes="member: 14176">You assume a lot and seem angry.Not sure where these &quot;stones&quot; are that I&#039;m throwing at Andy M and your region?Please quote them?I simply asked two questions, that I have been asking for years. They are reasonable questions, asked in a civil tongue, yet you drop veiled friend-bombs in multiple sentences when all I did was debunk your previous ridiculous explanation?My response was far from a &quot;diatribe&quot;.I too went to all the meetings that were offered in my Local, and I too have notes and still have all of the handouts given (I suspect those are what you are passing off as &quot;notes&quot;)What are you really mad about?Why does [USER=29765]@LagunaBrown[/USER] continue to pretend that Tim S played any role in this, when his Local had a stand alone contract?Why do they continue to act like Fred Z had anything to do with anything outside of Local 89 during the contract negotiations?Why aren&#039;t they talking about any of the presidents in Pennsylvania or Ohio, that were in holdout locals also?The attempt to villainize these two is unfair and suspicious.What are you guys still afraid of?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 2614032, member: 14176"] You assume a lot and seem angry. Not sure where these "stones" are that I'm throwing at Andy M and your region? Please quote them? I simply asked two questions, [B]that I have been asking for years. [/B] They are reasonable questions, asked in a civil tongue, yet you drop veiled friend-bombs in multiple sentences when all I did was debunk your previous ridiculous explanation? My response was far from a "diatribe". I too went to all the meetings that were offered in my Local, and I too have notes and still have all of the handouts given (I suspect those are what you are passing off as "notes") What are you really mad about? Why does [USER=29765]@LagunaBrown[/USER] continue to pretend that Tim S played any role in this, when his Local had a stand alone contract? Why do they continue to act like Fred Z had anything to do with anything outside of Local 89 during the contract negotiations? Why aren't they talking about any of the presidents in Pennsylvania or Ohio, that were in holdout locals also? The attempt to villainize these two is unfair and suspicious. What are you guys still afraid of? [/QUOTE]

Verification