Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="browniehound" data-source="post: 184131" data-attributes="member: 4653">Ya know Over95, I didn&#039;t even think of that!&nbsp; How could I not, this is what UPS is famous for giving more work with less people and expecting it to be done in less time.&nbsp; I still think UPS would try to keep us under 10 hours when possible. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; At the same time, in most cases I will welcome the OT.&nbsp; My problem with the OT is the time at which 10 hours of work ends.&nbsp; With an 830 start 10 hours is 730 with our &quot;forced hour lunch&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp; By the time I get home and washed up, I&#039;m eating dinner at 830.&nbsp; I&#039;d be happy working 12 hours a day if we could start 630 am (Fed-ex ground does it why can&#039;t we?) and be finished at 700 pm.&nbsp; I don&#039;t mind the hours, its the hour that I finish at is what bothers me.&nbsp; Getting rid of the 1 hour lunch would help all of us get home earlier.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="browniehound, post: 184131, member: 4653"] Ya know Over95, I didn't even think of that! How could I not, this is what UPS is famous for giving more work with less people and expecting it to be done in less time. I still think UPS would try to keep us under 10 hours when possible. At the same time, in most cases I will welcome the OT. My problem with the OT is the time at which 10 hours of work ends. With an 830 start 10 hours is 730 with our "forced hour lunch". By the time I get home and washed up, I'm eating dinner at 830. I'd be happy working 12 hours a day if we could start 630 am (Fed-ex ground does it why can't we?) and be finished at 700 pm. I don't mind the hours, its the hour that I finish at is what bothers me. Getting rid of the 1 hour lunch would help all of us get home earlier. [/QUOTE]

Verification