Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pickup" data-source="post: 658424">Okay, now I see my other point and why I made that comment in conjunction with your. , you linked up to articles that mention the unconstitutionality of this measure. I liked those arguments. I also think it might be unconstitutional when the measure goes against the religious rights of some people, namely christian scientists.Here is my edit: I realized if I thought of this, the christian scientists thought of it too and they went in a different direction than I thought, check out this link about how christian scientists want the cost of their treatments to be included under this plan:<a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,2239900.story" target="_blank">http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,2239900.story</a>Did it go through? I don&#039;t know. Like the senators who voted yes for this thing, I haven&#039;t read it either.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pickup, post: 658424"] Okay, now I see my other point and why I made that comment in conjunction with your. , you linked up to articles that mention the unconstitutionality of this measure. I liked those arguments. I also think it might be unconstitutional when the measure goes against the religious rights of some people, namely christian scientists. Here is my edit: I realized if I thought of this, the christian scientists thought of it too and they went in a different direction than I thought, check out this link about how christian scientists want the cost of their treatments to be included under this plan: [url]http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,2239900.story[/url] Did it go through? I don't know. Like the senators who voted yes for this thing, I haven't read it either. [/QUOTE]

Verification