Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brett636" data-source="post: 1440053" data-attributes="member: 249">Yep, Yep, and Yep.Someone aggressive enough to physically assault a police officer and attempt to take that officer&#039;s gun poses a very deadly threat to the community.&nbsp; That level of audacity means that anyone is a potential victim for this animal, and the officer was in the right continue to pursue if not infact obligated to do so.&nbsp; Probably not, but I imagine that in the world of law enforcement this is left up to the officers discretion as to whether continue pursuit or not.&nbsp; Doing so or not doing so does not equal murderous intent but perhaps concern for the public&#039;s safety as a whole.&nbsp; He has already robbed a business, assaulted a police officer, and if he had been able to take the officers gun from him would have murdered said police officer.&nbsp; I think that puts him in the category of very dangerous.&nbsp; If Wilson wasn&#039;t running on adenaline at this point I doubt you could consider him a human.&nbsp; To answer your last question is No, it doesn&#039;t matter.&nbsp; His duty to the public is that he stop this animal using any and all means at his disposal.&nbsp; Most of this last part of your post is irrelevant.&nbsp; Bottom line for the grand jury is did Officer Wilson murder Michael Brown in cold blood as he was surrendering.&nbsp; If the answer was a clear yes then I would support Officer Wilson&#039;s prosecution.&nbsp; Being that the evidence and eye witness accounts are coming increasingly clear the answer is no then its time to pack up the tent because this circus is about over.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brett636, post: 1440053, member: 249"] Yep, Yep, and Yep. Someone aggressive enough to physically assault a police officer and attempt to take that officer's gun poses a very deadly threat to the community. That level of audacity means that anyone is a potential victim for this animal, and the officer was in the right continue to pursue if not infact obligated to do so. Probably not, but I imagine that in the world of law enforcement this is left up to the officers discretion as to whether continue pursuit or not. Doing so or not doing so does not equal murderous intent but perhaps concern for the public's safety as a whole. He has already robbed a business, assaulted a police officer, and if he had been able to take the officers gun from him would have murdered said police officer. I think that puts him in the category of very dangerous. If Wilson wasn't running on adenaline at this point I doubt you could consider him a human. To answer your last question is No, it doesn't matter. His duty to the public is that he stop this animal using any and all means at his disposal. Most of this last part of your post is irrelevant. Bottom line for the grand jury is did Officer Wilson murder Michael Brown in cold blood as he was surrendering. If the answer was a clear yes then I would support Officer Wilson's prosecution. Being that the evidence and eye witness accounts are coming increasingly clear the answer is no then its time to pack up the tent because this circus is about over. [/QUOTE]

Verification