Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1986548" data-attributes="member: 17969">What will it take for you to believe the &quot;intelligence&quot; was faked?What will it take for you to understand the region (the middle east) and the religious differences and boundaries of each and how they play with one another?What will it take for you to accept that both wars were unneccessary and thousands of americans were killed for nothing?We both could view the &quot;unfiltered&quot; bullcrap the BUSH administration was selling, and we would come to the same conclusion at the time.The only &quot;fairytale&quot; here, is YOURS, to believe there was some legitimacy for the iraq war.&nbsp;&nbsp; Had we left Saddam Hussein alone, and just applied stronger sanctions against his country, we could have kept the region in check.But, back in 1997, the PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY had a different idea.Nation Building in the middle east was the goal, and they were going to attack Iraq no matter what.&nbsp; The only problem as PNAC saw, was convincing americans to support such a war.What better way to do that, than to convince the public that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and he intended on using them?&nbsp; Bush told us that he was recieiving YELLOW CAKE to fuel weapons and that he was going to be able to launch weapons of mass destruction, but it was then discovered that the intelligence on yellow cake was FAKED, and the Mi6 agent involved killed himself over it before he was to testify before the house of commons in England.The UK discovered that this information was FAKED and the Mi6 agent was working with the USA on promoting this falsehood.But YOU, want to discount it, because it doesnt fit the narrative you have been believing for over 12 years.I get it, its easier to be a sheep than a wolf.&nbsp;&nbsp; It fits you.TOS.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1986548, member: 17969"] What will it take for you to believe the "intelligence" was faked? What will it take for you to understand the region (the middle east) and the religious differences and boundaries of each and how they play with one another? What will it take for you to accept that both wars were unneccessary and thousands of americans were killed for nothing? We both could view the "unfiltered" bullcrap the BUSH administration was selling, and we would come to the same conclusion at the time. The only "fairytale" here, is YOURS, to believe there was some legitimacy for the iraq war. Had we left Saddam Hussein alone, and just applied stronger sanctions against his country, we could have kept the region in check. But, back in 1997, the PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY had a different idea. Nation Building in the middle east was the goal, and they were going to attack Iraq no matter what. The only problem as PNAC saw, was convincing americans to support such a war. What better way to do that, than to convince the public that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and he intended on using them? Bush told us that he was recieiving YELLOW CAKE to fuel weapons and that he was going to be able to launch weapons of mass destruction, but it was then discovered that the intelligence on yellow cake was FAKED, and the Mi6 agent involved killed himself over it before he was to testify before the house of commons in England. The UK discovered that this information was FAKED and the Mi6 agent was working with the USA on promoting this falsehood. But YOU, want to discount it, because it doesnt fit the narrative you have been believing for over 12 years. I get it, its easier to be a sheep than a wolf. It fits you. TOS. [/QUOTE]

Verification