Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 2016399" data-attributes="member: 22662">Incorrect on both. You are introducing gay marriage into the conversation and saying it is not the same as gun rights.   For the sake of argument,  and in the context of this "guns" thread, I am going to 100% agree.  Now, I am asking you if you are going to insist that jurisprudence does not exist, that 200 years of court interpretation, clarification, upholding laws and striking down statutes has no bearing on how today's court does and should consider the cases that come before it?  Are you insisting that there is one way and only one way that the Second Amendment can be understood? Cause, well, that's kinda what jurisprudence is and anyone thinking it shouldn't or doesn't play into court decisions has a very rudimentary understanding of this system of government.</blockquote>