Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 960195" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>I can understand the confusion you may have if you havent followed the case thoroughly. I can explain it for you to clear up the confusion.</p><p></p><p>After Zimmerman was taken into custody following the shooting, he was questioned by uniformed police officers. After that, the case was transferred to the homocide detectives for investigation. The lead investigator interviewed Zm and any and all "witnesses". Upon concluding the investigation, the lead investigator submitted a Sworn Afidavit charging Zm with murder. Unfortunately, the detective did not do any ballistics tests or trajectory testing, powder testing or scene re-creating.</p><p></p><p>The district attorney rejected the case for a lack of evidence.</p><p></p><p>This outraged the parents of trayvon, and the public got involved. Once involved, pressure grew and the case was re-opened and the district attorney who denied the case withdrew from the case and it was turned over to a special investigator.</p><p></p><p>The special investigator launched a massive investigation, along with the FBI crime lab and the justice department. Upon the conclusion of all the evidence involved, and micro examining of all the facts, the special investigator charged ZM with a lesser murder charge.</p><p></p><p>She didnt need a grand jury for a second degree charge. If she was going to pursue a first degree charge, she would have taken the case to the grand jury.</p><p></p><p>This isnt a tough case. Pretty basic.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps you out.</p><p></p><p>Peace</p><p></p><p>TOS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 960195, member: 17969"] I can understand the confusion you may have if you havent followed the case thoroughly. I can explain it for you to clear up the confusion. After Zimmerman was taken into custody following the shooting, he was questioned by uniformed police officers. After that, the case was transferred to the homocide detectives for investigation. The lead investigator interviewed Zm and any and all "witnesses". Upon concluding the investigation, the lead investigator submitted a Sworn Afidavit charging Zm with murder. Unfortunately, the detective did not do any ballistics tests or trajectory testing, powder testing or scene re-creating. The district attorney rejected the case for a lack of evidence. This outraged the parents of trayvon, and the public got involved. Once involved, pressure grew and the case was re-opened and the district attorney who denied the case withdrew from the case and it was turned over to a special investigator. The special investigator launched a massive investigation, along with the FBI crime lab and the justice department. Upon the conclusion of all the evidence involved, and micro examining of all the facts, the special investigator charged ZM with a lesser murder charge. She didnt need a grand jury for a second degree charge. If she was going to pursue a first degree charge, she would have taken the case to the grand jury. This isnt a tough case. Pretty basic. Hope this helps you out. Peace TOS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
guns
Top