Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 997541" data-attributes="member: 17969">Today, on the air, SEAN HANNITY IGNORANTLY suggested the same thing!&nbsp; Hannity, suggested that if someone was legally armed in the theatre, that person could have shot the gunman and saved lives.Here&#039;s the problem with this concept.1) The shooter was wearing a full bullet proof vest, an armored groin protector, armored leg shields, an armored neck shield, tactical gloves and a tactical helmet.&nbsp; How many shots from ANY handgun would have brought this idiot down with this kind of body protection.&nbsp;&nbsp; Answer??&nbsp; ZERO.Instead, the legally armed shooter would probably end up shooting innocent persons with all the smoke in the air and kaos that was happening in the isles.&nbsp; There is NO proof that anyone ARMED could have changed the circumstances in that theatre.The shooter, planned this event and executed it with serious intentions, and no one with a simple handgun in the theatre could have stopped him.&nbsp; The assault rifle alone would have been turned on the person with the handgun, and just using simple numerics, the rifle would have outshot the person until that person was also dead.Its LAME to suggest that a person legally armed would have saved the day.PeaceTOS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 997541, member: 17969"] Today, on the air, SEAN HANNITY IGNORANTLY suggested the same thing! Hannity, suggested that if someone was legally armed in the theatre, that person could have shot the gunman and saved lives. Here's the problem with this concept. 1) The shooter was wearing a full bullet proof vest, an armored groin protector, armored leg shields, an armored neck shield, tactical gloves and a tactical helmet. How many shots from ANY handgun would have brought this idiot down with this kind of body protection. Answer?? ZERO. Instead, the legally armed shooter would probably end up shooting innocent persons with all the smoke in the air and kaos that was happening in the isles. There is NO proof that anyone ARMED could have changed the circumstances in that theatre. The shooter, planned this event and executed it with serious intentions, and no one with a simple handgun in the theatre could have stopped him. The assault rifle alone would have been turned on the person with the handgun, and just using simple numerics, the rifle would have outshot the person until that person was also dead. Its LAME to suggest that a person legally armed would have saved the day. Peace TOS [/QUOTE]

Verification