Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 999211" data-attributes="member: 17969">You give the same lame answer time after time.&nbsp; Its like talking to a wall.&nbsp; With your gun or without your gun, in your scenario, sitting in the front, EVEN IF you could take out your weapon and WAS ABLE to discharge a round or two, they would have had a ZERO effect on this shooter who was protected from head to toe.&nbsp; YOUR gun would be like throwing marbles at him, and after you engaged him, he would OBVIOUSLY turn his weapons upon you and kill YOU and everyone else next to you.There are many people in the first rows who survived this shooting without being hit and that ALONE deminishes your argument.My real problem with guns isnt the gun itself, but the mindset that goes along with it.&nbsp; I believe that gun owners dont really believe its a right, rather, its a mental disorder that the gun just happens to cure at the moment.Its no different then a painpill, or Ridalin.&nbsp; The mindset of the gun owner all have the same excuses about self protection, but somehow, that ends up manisfesting itself into murders and crimes of passion.&nbsp; While it may take years for a gun owner to make that decision to kill someone, it always comes to the gun first, not divorce court, not the superior court, not the police, not counseling and not common sense.Its the gun that fuels crimes of passion and the reason that domestic violence at home ends up with a gun death.Face it bro, you clearly believe you could be that &quot;hero&quot; that could save the day, and I believe you are that guy who will jeopardize my child in a theatre beyond the original criminal.PeaceTOS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 999211, member: 17969"] You give the same lame answer time after time. Its like talking to a wall. With your gun or without your gun, in your scenario, sitting in the front, EVEN IF you could take out your weapon and WAS ABLE to discharge a round or two, they would have had a ZERO effect on this shooter who was protected from head to toe. YOUR gun would be like throwing marbles at him, and after you engaged him, he would OBVIOUSLY turn his weapons upon you and kill YOU and everyone else next to you. There are many people in the first rows who survived this shooting without being hit and that ALONE deminishes your argument. My real problem with guns isnt the gun itself, but the mindset that goes along with it. I believe that gun owners dont really believe its a right, rather, its a mental disorder that the gun just happens to cure at the moment. Its no different then a painpill, or Ridalin. The mindset of the gun owner all have the same excuses about self protection, but somehow, that ends up manisfesting itself into murders and crimes of passion. While it may take years for a gun owner to make that decision to kill someone, it always comes to the gun first, not divorce court, not the superior court, not the police, not counseling and not common sense. Its the gun that fuels crimes of passion and the reason that domestic violence at home ends up with a gun death. Face it bro, you clearly believe you could be that "hero" that could save the day, and I believe you are that guy who will jeopardize my child in a theatre beyond the original criminal. Peace TOS [/QUOTE]

Verification