Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brett636" data-source="post: 900134" data-attributes="member: 249">You just keep hoping this is the case.&nbsp; Even though we know Herman Cain is completely innocent of these allegations that doesn&#039;t mean Obama wouldn&#039;t use it against him if he becomes the nominee.&nbsp; It is what Obama does since he has a poor record that won&#039;t draw in voters he has to tear down his opponent through false accusations in order to have a shot at a 2nd term.&nbsp; Don&#039;t you think its quite sad when your ideals won&#039;t win you an election and your only hope is the demonizing of your opponent?&nbsp; Lets step back a moment and look at the situation in its entirety.&nbsp; These were events that took place over a decade ago.&nbsp; If I dug into your past and pulled out a warning letter you received in the late 90s would you be able to tell me exactly who, when, and why the situation took place on the spot?&nbsp; I thought not.&nbsp; Remember that Herman recused himself from the situation meaning he left the negotiating and the final decision up to the lawyers rather than up to him.&nbsp; He was not apart of any agreement so him not being able to recall a detail from an agreement that he was not a party too from over 12 years ago is perfectly acceptable and only highlights his humanity.&nbsp; As far as the audio quality of the recordings I don&#039;t see as a real issue.&nbsp; Compressing audio and video files to the point their quality suffers is hardly an issue anymore.&nbsp; With computer hard drive space being cheaper than it ever has been and computing power not being an issue for audio and video playback even on the most basic computers today I don&#039;t see why it would matter.&nbsp; Now that Herman has a well known defamation lawyer watching all this they have to be very careful how they approach this.&nbsp; Lin Wood has won many defamation cases with some high profile clients and I&#039;m sure these two bozos can&#039;t come up with the millions they would owe if they screwed up and went too far.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brett636, post: 900134, member: 249"] You just keep hoping this is the case. Even though we know Herman Cain is completely innocent of these allegations that doesn't mean Obama wouldn't use it against him if he becomes the nominee. It is what Obama does since he has a poor record that won't draw in voters he has to tear down his opponent through false accusations in order to have a shot at a 2nd term. Don't you think its quite sad when your ideals won't win you an election and your only hope is the demonizing of your opponent? Lets step back a moment and look at the situation in its entirety. These were events that took place over a decade ago. If I dug into your past and pulled out a warning letter you received in the late 90s would you be able to tell me exactly who, when, and why the situation took place on the spot? I thought not. Remember that Herman recused himself from the situation meaning he left the negotiating and the final decision up to the lawyers rather than up to him. He was not apart of any agreement so him not being able to recall a detail from an agreement that he was not a party too from over 12 years ago is perfectly acceptable and only highlights his humanity. As far as the audio quality of the recordings I don't see as a real issue. Compressing audio and video files to the point their quality suffers is hardly an issue anymore. With computer hard drive space being cheaper than it ever has been and computing power not being an issue for audio and video playback even on the most basic computers today I don't see why it would matter. Now that Herman has a well known defamation lawyer watching all this they have to be very careful how they approach this. Lin Wood has won many defamation cases with some high profile clients and I'm sure these two bozos can't come up with the millions they would owe if they screwed up and went too far. [/QUOTE]

Verification