Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Hilary Clinton
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 2349512" data-attributes="member: 12952"><p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-submits-email-questions-hillary-clinton-written-answers-oath-due-september-29/" target="_blank">Judicial Watch Submits Email Questions to Hillary Clinton – Written Answers, Under Oath, Due September 29 - Judicial Watch</a></p><p><strong>(Washington, DC)</strong> – Judicial Watch today announced it <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-hillary-interrogatories-01363/" target="_blank">submitted questions</a> to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29. On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-statement-interrogatories-depositions-hillary-clintons-email-system/" target="_blank">ordered</a> Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….” Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.</p><p></p><p>“These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straight-forward answers, under oath, from Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.</p><p></p><p>In his <a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-opinion-clinton-deposition-01363/" target="_blank">opinion</a> ordering Clinton to answer written questions under oath Judge Sullivan wrote:</p><p></p><p>The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business.</p><p></p><p>In its July 2016 request to depose Hillary Clinton, Judicial Watch argued:</p><p></p><p>Secretary Clinton’s deposition is necessary to complete the record. Although certain information has become available through investigations by the Benghazi Select Committee, the FBI, and the State Department Inspector General, as well as through Plaintiff’s narrowly tailored discovery to date, significant gaps in the evidence remain. Only Secretary Clinton can fill these gaps, and she does not argue otherwise.</p><p></p><p>***</p><p></p><p>To [Judicial Watch’s] knowledge, Secretary Clinton has never testified under oath why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are unsworn.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 2349512, member: 12952"] [URL="http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-submits-email-questions-hillary-clinton-written-answers-oath-due-september-29/"]Judicial Watch Submits Email Questions to Hillary Clinton – Written Answers, Under Oath, Due September 29 - Judicial Watch[/URL] [B](Washington, DC)[/B] – Judicial Watch today announced it [URL='http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-hillary-interrogatories-01363/']submitted questions[/URL] to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29. On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and [URL='http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-statement-interrogatories-depositions-hillary-clintons-email-system/']ordered[/URL] Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….” Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions. “These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straight-forward answers, under oath, from Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. In his [URL='http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-opinion-clinton-deposition-01363/']opinion[/URL] ordering Clinton to answer written questions under oath Judge Sullivan wrote: The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business. In its July 2016 request to depose Hillary Clinton, Judicial Watch argued: Secretary Clinton’s deposition is necessary to complete the record. Although certain information has become available through investigations by the Benghazi Select Committee, the FBI, and the State Department Inspector General, as well as through Plaintiff’s narrowly tailored discovery to date, significant gaps in the evidence remain. Only Secretary Clinton can fill these gaps, and she does not argue otherwise. *** To [Judicial Watch’s] knowledge, Secretary Clinton has never testified under oath why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are unsworn. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Hilary Clinton
Top
