Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="10 point" data-source="post: 1671722" data-attributes="member: 52520">For what reason was the C6 plan offered as a replacement for our far superior plan? When a BA tells the members that if they didn&#039;t vote to ratify this CBA they were just &quot;overpaid crybabies&quot;.&nbsp; I would say that constitutes a battle right out the gate.Why no change in art 17 except the IBT negotiators were offering it to us with the addition of &quot;service, methods and safety&quot; (in 17I of all things!); tried to pass it adding the MMI language in the Central Region and there were other discouraging changes.We&#039;re not ignorant to collective bargaining give and take but the surepost language is a cluster from day one and that pathetic info is straight from one of&nbsp; the IBT guys who was in the surepost negotiations.There&#039;s good reason for stewards to be aggravated and it&#039;s not just the vote no folks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="10 point, post: 1671722, member: 52520"] For what reason was the C6 plan offered as a replacement for our far superior plan? When a BA tells the members that if they didn't vote to ratify this CBA they were just "overpaid crybabies". I would say that constitutes a battle right out the gate. Why no change in art 17 except the IBT negotiators were offering it to us with the addition of "service, methods and safety" (in 17I of all things!); tried to pass it adding the MMI language in the Central Region and there were other discouraging changes. We're not ignorant to collective bargaining give and take but the surepost language is a cluster from day one and that pathetic info is straight from one of the IBT guys who was in the surepost negotiations. There's good reason for stewards to be aggravated and it's not just the vote no folks. [/QUOTE]

Verification